"It is very possible that PATERNAL AGE is the major predictor of(non-familial) autism." Harry Fisch, M.D., author "The Male Biological Clock". Sperm DNA mutates and autism, schizophrenia bipolar etc. results. What is the connection with autoimmune disorders? Having Type 1 diabetes, SLE,etc. in the family, also if mother had older father. NW Cryobank will not accept a sperm donor past 35th BD to minimize genetic abnormalities.VACCINATIONS also cause autism.

Monday, October 12, 2009

Pandemic Bill Passes House - Not over yet

Pandemic Bill Passes House - Not over yet !!!
Posted Saturday October 10, 2009 at 1:15 pm by Bob Dwyer (district 4)
The Massachusetts House of Representatives passed H-4271 in formal session on October 8th, 2009 by a vote of 114 yeas – 36 nays. (View Session Archive here: begins at 54 minutes) The purpose of this bill is to remove all liability for the manufacturers and administrators of this under tested H1N1 vaccine.

Mission Accomplished.

Interestingly enough, where 36 State Senators voted for S-2028 in a unanimous decision, 36 state Reps opposed the House version. The efforts of the MassLPA membership went not in vain, but in fact raised sufficient suspicion in the minds of many state representatives to get an equal amount of opposition in the House as proposition in the Senate. The roll call vote shows who the Representatives are that have paid homage to the Big Pharmaceuticals and Big Government lobbyists and which Reps. listened to their hearts and constituents to uphold our constitutional rights.

Hats off to State Reps. George Peterson and Brad Jones for speaking in behalf of the concerned citizens in a failed (22-124) effort to postpone this hearing and State Rep. Lewis Evangelidis for his statements against H4271.

In a public Statement by State Rep. Jeff Perry we find that his support for this bill does not address the most egregious aspects but focus on the warrant less searches and seizures, which was of course planted in the bill so that it could be the piece which if removed would be perceived as a victory for the civil liberties activists.

October 8, 2009

Contact: 617-722-2800, ext. 8743

Perry’s Statement on Passage of Pandemic Bill

House removes questionable provisions and add limitations on Governor

Boston – With the concerns regarding the different versions of the original Senate Bill 2028, Representative Jeffrey Davis Perry (R-Sandwich) released the following statement today:

"The Bill, as was originally written by the Senate, granted what I believe was improper new powers, including the entry into private property without a warrant and several other questionable conflicts with provisions of the Forth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

The version that passed the House of Representatives today addressed many of those concerns and others expressed by my constituents by striking the entry into private dwellings without a warrant, allowing for an appeal to the Superior Court of an isolation order and calling for the least restrictive means to be used. These are all positive steps and I appreciate the fact that my concerns were heard and addressed in the Committee process.

The revised Bill also includes a Republican Amendment which now more clearly defines the circumstances when the Governor can declare such a pandemic emergency. This is not the same Bill passed by the Senate. I believe this Bill strikes the proper balance between providing government with the limited, but necessary tools to deal with a pandemic. By removing many sections of the original Senate Bill and providing a due process mechanism to people who wish to challenge the actions of a government official, this Bill is now in an acceptable form. If the Senate does not adopt the improvements and protections made by the House today, I will not support the Bill in the future."


Mass Resistance blog

3. MA House quickly passes new version of controversial "pandemic control bill" with 17 amendments. More changes coming in conference committee! (We have the LATEST version.)

It wasn't pretty.

Yesterday (Thursday) as predicted, the Massachusetts House passed the new version of the controversial "pandemic control bill" (formerly S2028, now titled H4271) by a vote of 114-36. They also passed 17 last-minute amendments. Is this new version better or worse? We all need to look it over to be sure.

And thry're not done yet. Over the next several days it goes to a six-person "conference committee". The committee will create a bill with from the new House version and the more radical Senate version passed in April -- to create a "final" version for the Governor to sign.

Thursday's House debate was pretty upsetting to watch. It seemed like most of them had a cavalier and condescending attitude toward this very important legislation.

At the beginning, some Republicans made a motion to postpone the vote by at least a few days. Their reasoning made sense: The reps had received the new 15-page version - and the proposed amendments -- less than 24 hours before. In addition, the Ways and Means Committee members who wrote the new version were all at a public hearing in Gardner Auditorium, so they couldn't take part in the debate and explain why they wrote what they did. What difference would a few days make? But the leadership said no. They insisted on moving immediately. And the majority obeyed. The vote to postpone failed 22-125. (Heck, why bother reading legislation, anyway?)

Roll call vote 22-125 NOT to postpone the vote on 4271

Rep. Jeffrey Sanchez (D-Boston), a typical inner-city liberal, led the argument that basically everything in the bill is now fine so just go ahead and vote it in. The general attitude was that this is very urgent and the Legislature can't waste time looking it over.

They wasted no time going through the 17 amendments. It was almost comical: The clerk would start reading an amendment. After the first few sentences the chairman would stop him and say "If there's no objection we'll just move on." The author of the amendment would then step up and give a short speech about why the amendment was needed. Then the chairman would quickly call for a "voice vote" -- which was not really a voice vote at all but sort of a murmur -- and the chairman would immediately declare the amendment passed, and move on to the next amendment. There was almost no debate or questioning. Fnally, they took a roll call vote on the bill, which passed 133-36. And that was that.

House roll call vote 144-36 to pass bill H4271

Latest version of H4172 - directly from House clerk's office -- with amendments hand-written in!
(Read it . . . if you can!)

Main MassResistance main page on pandemic bill S2028 / H4173
We will be updating it as we get ALL the latest information and copies of current version of the bill.

The outrageous thing is that this is business as usual with our Massachusetts politicians. Nobody there acted as if this was anything out of the ordinary, though the rest of the country has paid a lot of attention. And we've seen it before, too. But that attitude still angers us, and others who think the public deserves better.

Will the final version protect your civil liberties? Or will the conference committee just quietly cave in to the bureaucrats? We know that the Department of Public Health can now access anyone's medical records under the bill, but will there still be restrictions on how they use them?

We'll keep you up to date on what happens.

Login or register to post comments Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Reddit Facebook
October 11, 2009 - 9:36pm — Dave Kopacz
Howdy All,
To show that I do in fact tend to follow my own advise, I want to provide a couple of links to some recent local efforts. The first link is probably the most important. I illustrates that one person CAN make a difference.

The following link is of my appearance at a local School Committee meeting. I was one of the first agenda items. My segment begins at 2:35 and ends at 27:00 minutes. Please do this in your town.

This link is to my first CATV show. Bob Dwyer and Dr. Paul joined me in the first segment, which was my warm-up for the School Committee meeting. The second segment was about the farm bill (H.R. 2749) and featured local Ag-Committee chairman / farmer Matt Biskup and Bill Gunn who is MassLPA District 1 Coordinator and member of the Ag-Committee as well.

Please check the calendar for "Red Pill Politics Road Show" events. Come join us at LIVE FILMINGS of the show and help get the word out.

Show ideas, comments, and hate mail to:

The price of Liberty is eternal vigilance!

Login or register to post comments URGENT Lawsuit filed against FDA to halt swine flu distribution
October 10, 2009 - 7:04pm — CAVEGRL777
NaturalNews) Health freedom attorney Jim Turner is filing a lawsuit in Washington D.C. mid-day Friday in an urgent effort to halt the distribution of the swine flu vaccine in America. On behalf of plaintiffs Dr. Gary Null and other licensed health care workers of New York State, the lawsuit charges that the FDA violated the law in its hasty approval of four swine flu vaccines by failing to scientifically determine neither the safety nor efficacy of the vaccines.

"The suit will seek an injunction against the FDA from approving the vaccine," attorney Jim Turner told NaturalNews on Thursday evening's Natural News Talk Hour show. "And the core of the argument is that they have not done the proper safety and efficacy tests on the vaccine to allow it to be released at this time."

The suit seeks to not only nullify the FDA's unlawful "approval" of the four H1N1 influenza vaccines, but to also ask the court to issue an injunction that would halt any mandatory vaccination requirements.

"The FDA is required by law to establish that a vaccine is safe and effective before it can be given to the public," said Turner. "We are arguing that they did not establish that the vaccine was effective, and did not establish that it was safe. They are trying to get it on the market by a waiver."

Vaccine / adjuvant combination has never been properly tested
The vaccine / adjuvant combination being referred to as the "swine flu vaccine" has apparently never been safety tested or approved by the FDA. In fact, in many cases the vaccine is being sent to clinics, pharmacies and other health establishments separately from the adjuvant chemical, leaving it up to each local vaccine retailer to properly mix the vaccine with the adjuvant, according to information provided by Turner. With hundreds of millions of Americans potentially being targeted with this vaccine, the potential for improper mixing, improper dosages, and human error is alarming.

If the charges described in the lawsuit are true, it means the FDA has blatantly abandoned medical science and violated its own regulations in approving not only these four vaccines, but the potentially deadly adjuvant chemicals as well. To date, the FDA has produced absolutely no scientific evidence documenting safety tests for any of these swine flu vaccines. There are no published studies, no records of any clinical trials, and no publicly-available paper trail demonstrating that any safety testing was done whatsoever. There is no researcher who has publicly put their name on the record declaring the vaccines to be safe, and no FDA official has ever stated that scientifically-valid safety testing has ever been conducted on the vaccine / adjuvant combinations now being distributed across America.

Normally, when a pharmaceutical achieves "FDA approved" status, there is a considerable paper trail of scientific scrutiny, peer review, clinical trials and other supporting evidence. To our knowledge, no such documents exist for the swine flu vaccines. The FDA's approval of these vaccines appears to be based entirely on a whim.

"What has been tested?" asked attorney Jim turner. "Where has it been tested? Who reviewed the test? Who looked at the test and said yes they proved safety and efficacy? There is no record that we can find that shows these things have been done."

By approving the four vaccines in the absence of such safety testing, the FDA itself stands in direct violation of federal law. "There is a law that they're supposed to follow and they are not following it," Turner added.

Billions of dollars are at stake
Why, then, did the FDA apparently violate the law and push these vaccines into full public distribution without securing the safety testing required by law? Turner suspects a profit motive may be involved: "They're charging $24.95 to get a vaccine. Multiplied by 100 million people, that's a lot of money. If you do the whole society, you're talking about several billion dollars."

In fact, the U.S. vaccination push could ultimately target over 200 million Americans, generating nearly $5 billion in vaccine-related revenues. Cashing in on those revenues, however, requires three things:

1) Spreading fear about H1N1 swine flu by exaggerating its dangers.

2) Quickly making a vaccine available for sale, even if it has never been thoroughly tested for safety and efficacy.

3) Aggressively marketing the vaccines before the H1N1 swine flu fizzles out and can no longer be hyped up as "highly virulent."

All three of these conditions are now being pushed aggressively in the U.S. by pharma-influenced health authorities at both the state and federal level. There is a mad, cult-like rush under way to vaccinate American citizens with an unproven, untested chemical that was thrust into distribution in apparent violation of federal law. And if this vaccine is not stopped, the price that may ultimately be paid in terms of lost lives could be quite dire.

It all harkens back to 1976 when a previous formulation of the swine flu vaccine paralyzed and killed thousands of Americans. Turner was one of the attorneys instrumental in halting that vaccine, and he fears a repeat situation could potentially recur today. He told NaturalNews, "[In 1976] they were intending to inoculate 200 million people. We stopped them... and somewhere between 40 and 50 million people were vaccinated. What ultimately brought it down is that a substantial number of people got 'French Polio' [Guillain-Barre syndrome], a paralysis that goes... through the body, and if it goes far enough you die."

About health freedom attorney Jim Turner
Jim Turner, with Citizens for Health (, is one of the most accomplished and respected health freedom attorneys practicing today. His firm, Swankin & Turner, represents businesses and individuals on a variety of regulatory issues relating to foods, drugs and health.

Donations to support this swine flu vaccine lawsuit are greatly welcomed. You can donate to on this page:

A special fund specifically focused on the swine flu vaccine lawsuit will be announced here on NaturalNews. Watch this story for an update.

Login or register to post comments http://www.freestateproject.o
October 10, 2009 - 6:06pm — matthewpaul

Login or register to post comments
October 12, 2009 - 3:19am — Brendon
My girlfriend and I just had a conversation about moving to New Hampshire after school in a year or two, and thanks for the link to the Free State Project. Hopefully the libertarian immigrants can surpase the antilibertarian immigrants going to NH from MA to vote for the same jerks who ruined MA.

Brendon DeMeo - Campaign for Liberty 5th District Coordinator

Login or register to post comments NH is looking better
October 11, 2009 - 9:58pm — skotmiller

Login or register to post comments
I'm moving, VT or NH?
October 10, 2009 - 5:31pm — skotmiller
I'm moving, VT or NH?

Login or register to post comments
Moving 2
October 10, 2009 - 10:12pm — CAVEGRL777
It is good mental health to stay away from the CRIMINALLY insane!

I am out of here!



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Top Autism Sites Health Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog Directory StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It! blog directory PageRank Button Add to Technorati Favorites Health Blogs
Directory of Health Blogs Blogarama - The Blog Directory