AUTISM PREVENTION FATHER BABIES 24-34 PATERNAL AGE IS KEY IN NON-FAMILIAL AUTISMVaccines

"It is very possible that PATERNAL AGE is the major predictor of(non-familial) autism." Harry Fisch, M.D., author "The Male Biological Clock". Sperm DNA mutates and autism, schizophrenia bipolar etc. results. What is the connection with autoimmune disorders? Having Type 1 diabetes, SLE,etc. in the family, also if mother had older father. NW Cryobank will not accept a sperm donor past 35th BD to minimize genetic abnormalities.VACCINATIONS also cause autism.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

WHO's lab CDC intensifies propaganda efforts on behalf of "swine flu" bioweapon

WHO's lab CDC intensifies propaganda efforts on behalf of "swine flu" bioweapon

Last Updated on Friday, 09 October 2009 12:16
Friday, 09 October 2009 11:24

News - Latest News

< Prev Next >


WHO's affiliated US lab, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), is intensitying its efforts to persuade pregnant women to take the untested swine flu jab with a Goebbels-style propaganda sheet calledWhat Should Pregnant Women Know About 2009 H1N1 Flu (Swine Flu)?

The key fact that pregnant women should know -- namely that the swine flu jab has not been tested on any pregnant women ever and that it contains mercury responsible for autism as well as dangerous adjuvants that are illegal in the USA and UK -- is not mentioned in the CDC "advice" sheet.

This "advice" appears to have only one purpose: to so alter and misrepresent the facts that people are ready to take a jab classified as a bioweapon that they would never ever take if they had access to the accurate information such as it is the CDC's duty to supply.

http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/guidance/pregnant.htm



What Should Pregnant Women Know About 2009 H1N1 Flu (Swine Flu)?

October 6, 2009 6:30 PM ET
On this Page

* What if I am pregnant and I get 2009 H1N1?
* What can I do to protect myself, my baby and my family?
* Is it safe for pregnant women to get a flu shot?
* Who else should get a flu shot?
* What else can I do?
* What are the symptoms of seasonal and 2009 H1N1 flu?
* What should I do if I get sick?
* How is 2009 H1N1 flu treated?
* When should I get emergency medical care?
* When should I get emergency medical care?

These questions and answers have been updated to include new information on 2009 H1N1 flu in pregnant women. Both seasonal and 2009 H1N1 flu viruses will circulate during the 2009-2010 flu season. A pregnant woman who thinks she has the flu should call her doctor right away to see if treatment with an antiviral medicine is needed. The medicine is most helpful if it is started soon after the pregnant woman becomes sick. The latest advice for getting seasonal and 2009 H1N1 vaccines during pregnancy is also included.
Photo of expecting motherWhat if I am pregnant and I get 2009 H1N1?

Call your doctor right away if you have flu symptoms or if you have close contact with someone who has the flu. Pregnant women who get sick with 2009 H1N1 can have serious health problems. They can get sicker than other people who get 2009 H1N1 flu. Some pregnant women sick with 2009 H1N1 have had early labor and severe pneumonia. Some have died. If you are pregnant and have symptoms of the flu, take it very seriously. Call your doctor right away for advice.
What can I do to protect myself, my baby and my family?

Getting a flu shot is the single best way to protect against the flu. Talk with your doctor about getting a seasonal flu shot and the 2009 H1N1 flu shot. You will need both flu shots this year to be fully protected against flu. You should get both shots as soon as they are available to protect you and your baby. The seasonal flu shot has been shown to protect both the mother and her baby (up to 6 months old) from flu-like illness.

Talk with your doctor right away if you have close contact with someone who has 2009 H1N1 flu. You might need to take medicine to reduce your chances of getting the flu. Your doctor may prescribe Tamiflu® or Relenza® to help prevent 2009 H1N1 flu. To prevent flu, you would take a lower dose of the antiviral medicine for 10 days.
Is it safe for pregnant women to get a flu shot?

The seasonal flu shot has been given to millions of pregnant women over many years. Flu shots have not been shown to cause harm to pregnant women or their babies. The 2009 H1N1 flu shot is made in the same way and in the same places as the seasonal flu shot. It is very important for pregnant women to get both the seasonal flu shot and the 2009 H1N1 flu shot. Please see http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/ to learn more.
Who else should get a flu shot?

Anybody who will be taking care of babies younger than 6 months of age should get a seasonal flu shot and a 2009 H1N1 flu shot to protect against the flu. This includes you and any family members or other people who will be caring for your baby for the first 6 months of his or her life. Please see http://www.cdc.gov/h1n1flu/vaccination/acip.htm to learn more.
What else can I

Comments Add New Search RSS



Wynter 2009-10-09 13:06:30

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why do they think we are retarded?? lolz
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 10


Profesor 2009-10-09 13:12:51

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Zombies will take the shot, anyway
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 10


Someone should SUE The CDC for Lying!!!!!
Francis Kuhn 2009-10-09 14:24:02

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Again this shows just how Governments lie through their teeth. Someone should donate them a Toilet Roll for when they talk.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 10


NUREMBERG CODE AGAINST FORCED VACCINES
Anonymous 2009-10-09 18:56:25

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NUREMBERG CODE AGAINST FORCED VACCINES

In August 1947, the judges delivered their verdict in the "Doctors' Trial" against Karl Brandt and several others. They also delivered their opinion on medical experimentation on human beings. Several of the accused had argued that their experiments differed little from pre-war ones and that there was no law that differentiated between legal and illegal experiments.

In April of the same year, Dr. Leo Alexander had submitted to the Counsel for War Crimes six points defining legitimate medical research. The trial verdict adopted these points and added an extra four. The ten points constituted the "Nuremberg Code". Although the legal force of the document was not established and it was not incorporated directly into either the American or German law, the Nuremberg Code and the related Declaration of Helsinki are the basis for the Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Volume 46[1], which are the regulations issued by the United States Department of Health and Human Services governing federally funded research in the United States. In addition, the Nuremberg code has also been incorporated into the law of individual states such as California, and other countries.

The Nuremberg code includes such principles as informed consent and absence of coercion; properly formulated scientific experimentation; and beneficence towards experiment participants.

The ten points of the Nuremberg Code

The ten points are, (all from United States National Institutes of Health)

1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him/her to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonable to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.

The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity.

2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature.

3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment.

4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.

5. No experiment should be conducted where there is a prior reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.

6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.

7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death.

8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.

10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.

Reprinted from Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. 2, pp. 181-182. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1949.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 00


UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Anonymous 2009-10-09 19:10:34

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a declaration adopted by the United Nations General Assembly (10 December 1948 at the Palais de Chaillot, Paris).
The Guinness Book of Records describes the UDHR as the "Most Translated Document" in the world. The Declaration arose directly from the experience of the Second World War and represents the first global expression of rights to which all human beings are entitled. It consists of 30 articles which have been elaborated in subsequent international treaties, regional human rights instruments, national constitutions and laws. The International Bill of Human Rights consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its two Optional Protocols. In 1966 the General Assembly adopted the two detailed Covenants, which complete the International Bill of Human Rights; and in 1976, after the Covenants had been ratified by a sufficient number of individual nations, the Bill took on the force of international law.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 00


liam donaldson complicit in harm
iatrogenic 2009-10-09 21:31:36

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sir Liam Donaldson has been the Chief Medical Officer for England, and the United Kingdom’s Chief Medical Adviser, since 1998. He holds critical responsibilities across the whole field of public health and health care.


As the United Kingdom’s chief adviser on health issues he advises the Secretary of State for Health, the Prime Minister and other government ministers.

He has produced landmark reports, which have set health policy and legislation in fields such as stem cell research, quality and safety of health care, infectious disease control, patient empowerment, poor clinical performance, smoke free public places, medical regulation, and organ and tissue retention.

Sir Liam is also recognised as an international champion of patient safety and has Chaired the World Health Organization World Alliance for Patient Safety since its launch in 2004.

Before becoming Chief Medical Officer, Sir Liam held posts in hospital medicine and surgery, General Practice, public health, academic medicine, and health care management.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 00


Anonymous 2009-10-10 02:01:37

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Talk about propaganda...here's a latest article (they talked about this on the local radio talk show): http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091010/ap_on_he_me/us_med_swine_flu

What do you make of this? First they said it's a "novel" virus so EVERYONE is so vulnerable to it, only the very elderly may have some immunity...now have you noticed how they've changed their tune and calling it a "children's flu"? They're saying 78 kids died in just a short while, more than seasonal flu. Yet previously we were told swine flu was mild - so has it suddenly become more virulent that it's now killing more kids than seasonal flu? Or did they just figure out they can't convince the adults to get vaccinated but just as they've always mandated vaccines for kids they're now striking at the kids again cause they can! And how can we know what these kids are really dying of? This is going to go on all flu season isn't it...the CDC exagerating data like this... Changing their story this way and that way...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 00


Anonymous 2009-10-10 06:47:44

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION IS THE DRIVING FORCE BEHIND THIS - WITHOUT THE DECLARATION OF A PANDEMIC, THE PHARMA COMPANIES ARE STUFFED. DO ALL THESE LAW SUITS INCLUDE WHO AS PART OF THIS ILLEGAL CARTEL?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ReplyQuote 00


Spreading The Flu
Freeone 2009-10-10 13:14:45

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once the virus is spread thru the needle it will spread thru handling credit cards,ATM machines, and money. These will be the 21st century version of spreading the flu by rats.

Labels:

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Top Autism Sites Health Blogs -  Blog Catalog Blog Directory StumbleUpon Toolbar Stumble It! http://www.stumbleupon.com/submit?url=http://www.yoursite.com/article.php&title=The+Article+Title blog directory PageRank Button Add to Technorati Favorites Health Blogs
Directory of Health Blogs Blogarama - The Blog Directory