A case against the H1N1 swine flu vaccine (Part 1)

A case against the H1N1 swine flu vaccine (Part 1)
August 26, 12:45 AMLas Vegas Diet and Exercise ExaminerJustin J. McCoy






Get a Shot. "A Shot of Protection". So says the 1976 ad campaign encouraging the mass vaccination of millions against the so called "swine flu". It worked..sorta. Around 40 millions doses of vaccine were distributed and injected into the population before the sudden halt of the program. The reason? Hundreds of individuals came down with a debilitating auto-immune response called Guillian-Barre syndrome or GBS and dozens died as a result of the flu jabs. GBS causes paralysis in the extremities and the facial muscles. Guillain-Barre is one of the leading causes of non-trauma-induced paralysis in the world.
Only one individual succumbed to the actual "swine flu", so as you can see the vaccination campaign was a PR disaster costing the government millions in damages, and saw the enactment of a new law by the FDA and recently signed by HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius to protect the government from having to pay out millions again, should something like this happen in the future. The law gives pharmaceutical companies complete immunity from lawsuits due to deaths or complications from vaccines. It goes on to protect the government from similar legal actions as well. So, basically by accepting any experimental vaccine you have no recourse if any problems arise from the injections. You may not file a lawsuit against anyone. It's a "inject at your own risk" scenario, just to give you a heads up.
1976 was 33 years ago, what does it have to do with today's "swine flu" pandemic that seems to be not really accomplishing much in terms of fatalities, and the disease has been relatively mild in those that have tested positive after contracting the virus. So, why all the fuss and rush to get a sweeping experimental vaccination program going under the guise of "public health"? What's with the fear mongering? Does it seem to you that ever since 9/11/01 Fear has played a central roll in getting things going for the government? From the passing of the Patriot Act, to domestic spying, to torture, to the color coded "terror alert", to only letting you bring 3 ounces of shampoo on-board an airplane AND forcing you to take your shoes off to do it. Well, it does to me. It seems very much like a perpetual fear machine coming out of Washington and in this instance from the CDC, the WHO and the Dept. of Health and Human Services. We could debate the reasoning and logic behind the fear mongering, but It'd be more prudent to discuss the facts in regards to this "Novel 2009 H1N1 Influenza" vaccine and the structure and components involved.
When researching what ingredients were actually used to compose this experimental vaccine, a number of red flags went up. First off, just know that you are being injected with the actual H1N1 "novel" swine/bird/human flu virus mutation. That IS in the needle of course, that isn't a question. And just like any cold or flu virus, there's no guarantee you're going to contract it anyways, but being inoculated with it in the vial will take away that chance, as you will be getting it 100% for sure, inactivated or attenuated (depending on where you are), intravenously into your bloodstream.
The body's brilliant immune system is designed to handle pathogens that enter the body (through the nose and mouth mainly) in a certain way. The body is not designed to have viruses injected directly into the blood stream via a vaccine. That's not how the immune system works. It's akin to, for example, instead of eating a meal, you just shove it thru a tube directly into your stomach, without chewing or swallowing it. That's not how it works. You're made to bite, chew, swallow then digest. There's an order.
We handle things in a similar order when it comes to our immune responses to pathogens. Our current scientific research still doesn't know exactly why or how our bodies work in this respect, and we won't know for a very long time. The human body is a marvelous, mysterious machine and to think we know better than it, is foolish at best and extremely dangerous at worst.
Back to the vaccine. So, in the vials is the H1N1 virus. The virus will be "attenuated" in some instances, mainly for the first dose and then a full-on "un-attenuated" version, usually for the second injection. This will be a "duplex" inoculation meaning 2 doses spread a few weeks apart. Attenuated simply means weakened. In addition to the virus, comes the "fun" stuff and this is what doing this research is all about. To unearth what exactly you're putting into your body. Everyone has a right to FULL disclosure when it comes to their individual, sovereign bodies and what they put into it, especially an UNTESTED, UNTRIED, EXPERIMENTAL VACCINE.
The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells from animals and "we do not know if there could be an allergic reaction", says Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a German lung specialist and the chairman of the health committee in the German parliament and European Council. The vaccine - as Johannes Löwer, president of the Paul Ehrlich Institute, has pointed out - can also cause worse side effects than the actual swine flu virus. Dr. Wolfgang went on to say, "Swine flu is not very different from normal flu. On the contrary if you look at the number of cases it is nothing compared to a normal flu outbreak.”
In addition to the cancerous cells, formaldehyde (yes the preservative used for corpses) is included in the mix, along with thimerasol (mercury), and an oil-based "adjuvant" know as MF-59 which contains two main ingredients of concern- squalene and gp120. It is manufactured by the Chiron Pharmaceutical Company. What is of concern is, immune adjuvants in a number of studies have shown to be a cause of devastating autoimmune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and lupus.
Animal studies using this MF-59 adjuvant have found them to be deadly. A study using 14 guinea pigs found that when they were injected with the special adjuvant, only one animal survived. A repeat of the study found the same deadly outcome. The MF-59 adjuvant has been used in several vaccines. These vaccines, including tetanus and diphtheria, are the same vaccines frequently associated with adverse reactions.
So, what is this deadly ingredient? It is called squalene, a type of oil. Squalene in vaccines has been strongly linked to the Gulf War Syndrome (which ruined the lives of hundreds of thousands of troops and killed thousands of others.) Veteran vaccine risk assessor, Dr. Viera Scheibner, investigated squalene’s use as a vaccine adjuvant and wrote: “Squalene contributed to the cascade of reactions called Gulf War Syndrome. GIs developed arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, deadly Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon with paroxysms of lack of blood in fingers and toes in fingers and toes, Sjorgren’s syndrome with blurred vision, chronic diarrhea, night sweats and low-grade fever.”
Gary Matsumoto, an award-winning investigative journalist, wrote: " Squalene is not just a molecule found in a knee or elbow, it is found throughout the nervous system and the brain. . . . When injected in the body, the immune system attacks it as an enemy to be eliminated." Matsumoto went on to say, "Eating and digesting squalene isn’t a problem. But injecting it “galvanize(s) the immune system into attacking it, which can produce self-destructive cross reactions against the same molecule in the places where it occurs naturally in the body - and where it is critical to the health of the nervous system.”
The other ingredient in MF-59 is a glycoprotein known as "gp120" belonging to the envelope of the human AIDS virus, HIV-1. Gp120 includes recombinant HIV proteins and peptides (subunit vaccines), HIV-1 or SIV (the monkey AIDS virus), killed or ‘attenuated’, ie, rendered harmless by successive passage in cultured cells, and a wide range of recombinant viral, bacterial and plasmid vectors expressing HIV proteins. But the gp120 gene has other properties that pose an even greater threat to the vaccinated population. It contains ‘recombination hotspots’ similar to those in bacteria and viruses such as Haemophilus influenzae, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus and herpes simplex virus, that often co-infect with the HIV, and also similar to recombination elements found in immunoglobulin genes and oncogenes (genes associated with cancer) in the human host.
So as you can see, there is a lot of non-disclosure by the main stream media as well as the medical establishment when it comes to ingredients included in the vaccine makers protocol for this Novel H1N1 swine flu vaccine. There's enough information out there, for the truth seekers and researchers amongst us to uncover and expose the truth so we can make informed decisions about our own bodies and health.
This past week, A poll of doctors for Pulse magazine found that 49% would reject the vaccine with 9% still undecided. A second poll conducted by GP (General Practitioner) magazine reveals that Up to 60% of GPs have severe doubts over the proposed vaccine. Of those who said they would not take the shot, 71% said they were concerned that the vaccine had “not been through sufficient trials to guarantee its safety”. Over half, 50.4%, said they “believe that swine flu is too mild to justify taking the vaccine”.
However, these figures dovetail with those from a much larger Nursing Times magazine poll, that revealed 30% of all NHS nurses said they would refuse to be immunized, with another 33% saying they were unsure.
There's more information to share, which will be included in Part 2 of this report as well as very simple steps you can take for avoiding this mild flu and any other flu or cold virus that could creep up on you this winter. Don't worry and don't fear catching the actual flu, but you might have a bit more to be concerned about if you decide to roll up your sleeve for an experimental swine flu vaccine.
At the end of the day it is YOUR decision, and yours alone to make. But, having yourself armed with truth and knowledge is the power you need to make the right decision for you and your family. "Forewarned is Forearmed", as the saying goes.
Godspeed.
Further reading and research recommended. Yes, I back up and stand behind my writing. I do the research so you don't have to. =)
www.nvic.org//
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/fastTrackSwineFluVaccineUnderFire.php
http://www.bild.de/BILD/news/bild-english/world-news/2009/08/07/swine-flu-health-expert-warning/does-virus-vaccine-increase-risk-of-cancer.html
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2009/08/04/squalene-the-swine-flu-vaccines-dirty-little-secret-exposed.aspx
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/isisnews/i-sisnews11-19.php
http://drtenpenny.com
Take a deep breath, Swine Flu’s not that bad
http://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2009/07/31/legal-immunity-set-for-swine-flu-vaccine-makers.aspx
One in Two UK physicians will refuse the vaccine. - Link
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1206807/Swine-flu-jab-link-killer-nerve-disease-Leaked-letter-reveals-concern-neurologists-25-deaths-America.html
http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m8d1-Swine-flu-vaccine-Government-grants-immunity
http://www.examiner.com/x-6495-US-Intelligence-Examiner~y2009m7d31-Vaccines-for-children-not-effective
Even The Lancet Has Concerns About Flu Vaccines