Booster=Adjuvants=Squalene

Stanford study hopes to reduce number of swine flu shots
By Julia Prodis Sulek


jsulek@mercurynews.com

Posted: 08/31/2009 06:01:20 PM PDT
Updated: 08/31/2009 09:30:46 PM PDT


Worried there won't be enough of the swine flu vaccine?

Stanford researchers are beginning clinical trials to determine whether vaccines for the swine flu virus, also known as H1N1, could be stretched by lowering the dosage and coupling it with a booster.

If successful, it could mean that doctors would give people one swine flu shot instead of the anticipated two doses spread three weeks apart.

"Going to the public with a two-vaccination regimen is going to be complicated, there's no doubt," said Dr. Cornelia Dekker, who is running the clinical trial at Stanford. If the Stanford study determines only one dose is needed, "it would be a great source of comfort" to health professionals putting vaccination programs together.

The government had hoped to have 120 million doses of the H1N1 vaccine on hand by Oct. 15. Because of delays in the manufacturing process, however, only 45 million doses are expected to be available by then.

The Stanford study results are unlikely to translate into a new booster-infused vaccine before the end of the year. Boosters are added to the vaccine to strengthen the immune system and make the vaccine more potent; such methods have been used with previous flu vaccines. If the lower dosages are successful, the supply could be extended in late winter.

Because most people's immune systems have never been exposed to the virus, a vaccine is critical to deter its spread. In Santa Clara County alone, six


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Advertisement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
people have died since the pandemic began in the spring and at least 77 have been hospitalized.

To limit the spread of swine flu before the vaccine is ready, health officials continue to urge people to wash their hands frequently, stay home if ill and not return to school or work until 24 hours after symptoms disappear.

The public is also encouraged to be vaccinated for the seasonal flu now, several weeks earlier than when seasonal flu shots are normally available, so health professionals won't be overwhelmed by requests for both seasonal and swine flu vaccines come mid-October.

Safeway began offering seasonal flu shots on Aug. 19, more than a month before the supermarket normally does. And the demand is already as high as it normally is in late September.

In its Milpitas store alone, 200 people have received flu shots — and that's without much publicity, said Safeway spokeswoman Susan Houghton.

Dr. Marty Fenstershieb, Santa Clara County's public health officer, said there's no harm in getting the seasonal flu vaccine early.

"If people have any concern that getting it early means it won't last, it will last," he said. "Getting it now will last them through the season."

Pregnant women and people with chronic health problems are the most vulnerable to serious complications from swine flu. Most people who have contracted swine flu recover at home with standard fever medication, much like the seasonal flu, Fenstershieb said. The average age of those infected so far with swine flu is about 17, he said. And though that age group might not suffer the most severe flu symptoms, he said, it's important to vaccinate them so they don't spread it to the more vulnerable.

Stanford is recruiting 130 volunteers that it will divide into two groups: those ages 18 to 64 and those 65 and older.

"That older age group is a little harder to immunize," Dekker said. The booster, also called an adjuvant, will hopefully result in a better response from the immune systems of older people, she said.

Unlike other clinical trials at Stanford that take as long as six weeks to enroll volunteers, this study is on a fast track, with enrollment ending within a week.

"Our current plan is to start our screening the week after Labor Day," Dekker said. "The following week, our goal is to be immunizing" by Sept. 14.

Squalene will be in H1N1 vaccines and that is NOT good news

French government document details forced mass vaccination plans from September 28th:

EMERGENCY UPDATE: French government document details forced mass vaccination plans from September 28th: GPs and hospitals to be excluded. Similar documents believed to be circulating in all WHO member states

Last Updated on Monday, 31 August 2009 10:07
Sunday, 30 August 2009 17:37



An internal French government document that outlines detailed plans and orders for the force vaccination of the French population using secure “vaccine” facilities and starting from September 28th has emerged.

http://www.sante-jeunesse-sports.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Circulaire_vaccination_090824.pdf

The document dated August 21st and signed by the French Health Minister Rosaylne Batchelot-Narquin and the French Minister of Interior, Minister of the Interior, Overseas Territories Brice Hortefeux is addressed to the heads of each of France’s defense zones. the regional prefects in charge of police and the gendamerie, the prefects of departments and the heads of regional health authorities for hospitalization.

The objective of the 19-page document is the systematic vaccination of the entire French population in the period October, November, December 2009 and January 2010.

Secure facilities are to be established in every region that will serve as “vaccination centers”.

On page 3 the order is explicitly given that no medical establishments should serve as vaccine centers.

GPs are to play no role in the vaccination programme.

School age children are to be vaccinated by special mobile pandemic vaccination teams in their schools.

The largest vaccination facilities – Centers of Vaccination of a Large Capacity (Centres de vaccination de grande capacite (CVGC) – with added security (fonctionnement renforce) are calculated to vaccinate 2,100 people each day.

Vaccine “teams” are to work in parallel vaccinating people in three 4-hour blocs each day, and the document calculates that two teams operating in this way will allow 184,800 injections to be given to 92,400 people in a center working five days a week for the entire four month period of the mass vaccination campaign.

No explicit mention of forced vaccination is made but the document states that everyone in the country without exception is to be vaccinated.

Data from the health insurance bodies are to be used to ensure that everyone receives the toxic "swine flu" jab.

The need to implement measures to track every single person in France to determine whether they have been vaccinated or not is stressed.

Provisions to protect vaccine supplies are included. Emphasis is given to the need to store the vaccines at temperatures between 2 and 8 degrees.

Babies from six months are to be given the vaccines, which contain ingredients such as the adjuvant squalene and also in a dose more than 60,000 times higher than the amount of squalene that caused the Gulf War Syndrome in US and UK soldiers.

The use of squalene is illegal in the USA and UK but is expected to be allowed there too under an emergency pandemic decree.

The French government has bought 94 million doses of “swine flu” vaccine from Baxter, GSK, Novartis and Sanofi to carry out the forced vaccination programme.

The GSK and Novartis vaccines are classified as bioweapons by US and EU regulators and contain the dangerous squalene.

Baxter was found deliberately contaminating vaccine material with the live bird flu virus in Austria this February in order to start a global pandemic. WHO supplied the live bird flu virus, according to Baxter’s own spokesperson.

Baxter, Novartis and GSK executives sit on a key vaccine advisory board of WHO which recommended forced mass vaccinations in July, which are expected to bring in profits as high as 50 billion USD for vaccine companies.

Following WHO’s declaration of a pandemic level 6 emergency on June 11th, the world has moved under military law under WHO’s International Health Regulations 2005 incorporated in member state’s pandemic plans.

WHO, the UN, Baxter and other pharmaceutical companies are all linked with the Rockefeller and Rothschild and other family dynasties, who stand to make political and financial gains from the global forced vaccination programme under WHO.

WHO memos dating from 1972, discovered by Patrick Jordan, explain how to use vaccines to kill people by weakening their immune system, loading their bodies with viruses and creating a massive inflammatory reaction.

The August 21st document issued by the French government appears to be a chilling plan to initiate the mass murder of the French population by means of toxic vaccines under the cover of offering protection against a pandemic in just four weeks time.

Similar documents are believed to be circulating in all 194 member states of the WHO.

It is addressed to high ranking government officials who are ordered to prepare to supervise and coordinate the implementation of the forced vaccination programme in their regions, and to submit appropriate plans by the middle of September.

The general public is only to be "informed" at the end of September of the plans by means of communications to the local press.

The establishment of large-scale vaccine centers in "secure" facilities is a chilling echo of the Nazi concentration camps such as Buchenwald where inmates were killed by injections.

The French plan lists in detail the duties the “vaccination” teams are to perform, the layout of the vaccination centers, the location of the furniture, such as tables, and the number of vaccinations to be carried out in specific time frames by centers of various sizes.

The number of people prescribed to be vaccinated in four-hour sessions by a typical “vaccine team” is 360.

A typical vaccination “post” is to consist of “three agents”, one "agent" responsible for "preparing" the vaccines, one for administering them and one for tracking people who have been vaccinated.

A Table on page 11-12 lists the team's different responsibilities.

Personnel are to be assigned to “welcome” people and to issuing questionnaires. However, no personnel are to be assigned to collecting or checking the questionnaires, sparking fears that the issuing of the questionnaires is just a control measure and a subterfuge to reassure people.

There is no mechanism envisaged for abandoning the mass vaccination campaign if evidence emerges that the vaccination campaign is causing injury or death as happened in the USA in 1976 in spite of fears that the “swine flu” vaccine is unsafe und untested.

Medical experiments using physical coercion on people are illegal under domestic and international law.

The document refers to laws Article L3131-8 and Article L3131-9 that allow prefects and the Prime Minister to issue decrees to compel medical personnel, including medical students and medical army personnel, to administer vaccines or face penalties.

Here are the laws in French

States Are Preparing For Mandatory H1N1 (Swine Flu) Vaccinations

BJinChicago

BJinChicago

S.O.S. Squalene in Swine Flu Vaccine

S.O.S Gulf War Syndrome: WHO Allows 22+ Mio. Seasonal and Innumerable Swine Flu Vaccinations with 1 Million Times More Squalene….

Vaccine researchers, doctors, nurses and those in the know will refuse swine flu shots.

Historical facts about the dangers (and failures) of vaccines

Historical facts about the dangers (and failures) of vaccines
Saturday, August 29, 2009 by: Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, NaturalNews Editor
Key concepts: Vaccines, Vaccination and Health
View on NaturalPedia: Vaccines, Vaccination and Health




(NaturalNews) Vaccines are the quackery of modern medicine. Mass vaccination programs not only fail to protect the population from infectious disease, they actually accelerate the spread of disease in many cases.

Many website have cropped up over the last few years to counter the pro-vaccine propaganda put out by drug companies (who profit from vaccines) and health regulators (who serve the drug companies). One of those sites is www.VaccinationDebate.com , which lists the following historical facts about vaccines:

• In the USA in 1960, two virologists discovered that both polio vaccines were contaminated with the SV 40 virus which causes cancer in animals as well as changes in human cell tissue cultures. Millions of children had been injected with these vaccines. (Med Jnl of Australia 17/3/1973 p555)

• In 1871-2, England, with 98% of the population aged between 2 and 50 vaccinated against smallpox, it experienced its worst ever smallpox outbreak with 45,000 deaths. During the same period in Germany, with a vaccination rate of 96%, there were over 125,000 deaths from smallpox. (http://www.soilandhealth.org/02/020...)
The Hadwen Documents

• In Germany, compulsory mass vaccination against diphtheria commenced in 1940 and by 1945 diphtheria cases were up from 40,000 to 250,000. (Don't Get Stuck, Hannah Allen)

• In 1967, Ghana was declared measles free by the World Health Organisation after 96% of its population was vaccinated. In 1972, Ghana experienced one of its worst measles outbreaks with its highest ever mortality rate. (Dr H Albonico, MMR Vaccine Campaign in Switzerland, March 1990)

• In 1977, Dr Jonas Salk who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists, that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 "Abstracts" )

• In the UK between 1970 and 1990, over 200,000 cases of whooping cough occurred in fully vaccinated children. (Community Disease Surveillance Centre, UK)

• In the 1970's a tuberculosis vaccine trial in India involving 260,000 people revealed that more cases of TB occurred in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. (The Lancet 12/1/80 p73)

• In 1978, a survey of 30 States in the US revealed that more than half of the children who contracted measles had been adequately vaccinated. (The People's Doctor, Dr R Mendelsohn)

• The February 1981 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association found that 90% of obstetricians and 66% of pediatricians refused to take the rubella vaccine.

• In 1979, Sweden abandoned the whooping cough vaccine due to its ineffectiveness. Out of 5,140 cases in 1978, it was found that 84% had been vaccinated three times! (BMJ 283:696-697, 1981)

• In the USA, the cost of a single DPT shot had risen from 11 cents in 1982 to $11.40 in 1987. The manufacturers of the vaccine were putting aside $8 per shot to cover legal costs and damages they were paying out to parents of brain damaged children and children who died after vaccination. (The Vine, Issue 7, January 1994, Nambour, Qld)

• In Oman between 1988 and 1989, a polio outbreak occurred amongst thousands of fully vaccinated children. The region with the highest attack rate had the highest vaccine coverage. The region with the lowest attack rate had the lowest vaccine coverage. (The Lancet, 21/9/91)

• In 1990, a UK survey involving 598 doctors revealed that over 50% of them refused to have the Hepatitis B vaccine despite belonging to the high risk group urged to be vaccinated. (British Med Jnl, 27/1/1990)

• In the USA, from July 1990 to November 1993, the US Food and Drug Administration counted a total of 54,072 adverse reactions following vaccination. The FDA admitted that this number represented only 10% of the real total, because most doctors were refusing to report vaccine injuries. In other words, adverse reactions for this period exceeded half a million! (National Vaccine Information Centre, March 2, 1994)

• In 1990, the Journal of the American Medical Association had an article on measles which stated " Although more than 95% of school-aged children in the US are vaccinated against measles, large measles outbreaks continue to occur in schools and most cases in this setting occur among previously vaccinated children." (JAMA, 21/11/90)

• In the New England Journal of Medicine July 1994 issue a study found that over 80% of children under 5 years of age who had contracted whooping cough had been fully vaccinated.

• On November 2nd, 2000, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) announced that its members voted at their 57th annual meeting in St Louis to pass a resolution calling for an end to mandatory childhood vaccines. The resolution passed without a single "no" vote. http://www.wellnesschiro.com/physic...
(Report by Michael Devitt)

Source: http://www.vaccinationdebate.com/we...



Read more at NaturalPedia
You can also learn a wealth of information about the dangers of vaccines at NaturalPedia.com. Try these pages for more:

Vaccines: http://naturalpedia.com/vaccines.html

Vaccinations: http://naturalpedia.com/vaccination...

Gardasil: http://naturalpedia.com/gardasil.html

HPV: http://naturalpedia.com/HPV.html

The more you learn about vaccines, the more bizarre the pro-vaccine camp begins to look. And if you dig really deep, it becomes apparent their vaccines are based on nothing more than wishful thinking and circular logic (we support vaccines because we support vaccines, etc.).

So what's better than vaccines? Health education. A healthy population with high levels of vitamin D and other essential nutrients needs no vaccines. Maybe that's why they're never told about these things: Big Pharma's vaccine business depends on people remaining nutritionally ignorant. See http://www.naturalnews.com/026843_h... for more details.

Lack of Fear Shifts Sensationalistic Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda Campaign into Overdrive

Lack of Fear Shifts Sensationalistic Swine Flu Vaccination Propaganda Campaign into Overdrive
Bill Lindner August 29, 2009As the hype, fearmongering and sensationalistic propaganda push regarding the Swine Flu shifts into overdrive, Government health officials are reportedly mobilizing -- having set aside $16 million since populations aren't fearful enough -- to launch a massive Swine Flu vaccination campaign aimed at vaccinating at least half of the country's population within the next couple of months.

Since the outbreak of the suspiciously manipulated Swine Flu Pandemic of questionable origin, Scientists are rushing to test Swine Flu vaccine, allegedly to make sure it's safe and effective -- despite the fact that the U.S. government has egregiously granted the large Pharmaceutical companies who are raking in billions of dollars for hurriedly manufacturing Swine Flu vaccines impunity if recipients of the vaccines die or become deathly ill. Given the potential for disastrous long-term effects from some of the ingredients in some of the Vaccines, rushing to make sure it's safe and effective only makes matters worse since it can actually take years before you know how safe and effective they really are.

It was originally reported that the Swine flu came from human, swine and bird flu strains, but now it appears that some Scientists may have traced one strain to a strain that emerged in 1998 in the U.S. -- unless there is more than one type Swine Flu strain being spread around. With labs as technologically advanced as they are nowadays, especially the government laboratory in Ft. Detrick, Maryland with its list of ties to several acts of malfeasance, many possibilities abound.

It's not known how many shots people will need, what the correct dosage should be, and gaining public trust in backing the need for such an extensive vaccination plan has become, for the most part, impossible. Every year health professionals start squawking about oncoming flu seasons, and this year is no different, except that the Swine Flu numbers and information is being manipulated to allow the World Health Organization (WHO), shrouded in secrecy, to artifically inflate numbers to create an overblown pandemic.

Some of the major networks, including NBC -- and their subsidiary MSNBC -- have medical 'professionals' such as Dr. Nancy Snyderman pushing for people to line up and get their tainted Swine Flu vaccinations that Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and member of the Bilderberg Group, gave Pharmaceuticals impunity for. More information on the planned Depopulation of the world envisioned by corrupted politicians and billionaires can be found in this speech that was recently given by David Rockefeller regarding world depopulation.

Swine Flu Outbreak has Been far Less Deadly than Normal Flu

Snyderman is pushing for vaccinations despite the fact that the Swine Flu outbreak has been far less deadly than the normal flu. Snyderman has been joined by President Obama's White House in using prominent media, blogs and social networking to push their propaganda and make millions receive extremely questionable vaccines. Federal authorities are planning to initiate a nationwide campaign to persuade Americans to get the Swine Flu vaccines, despite the fact that half of the Health workers polled by the British Medical Journal are reportedly rejecting the Swine Flu vaccines because of the additives being used and the potential side effects they'll induce.

The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) continues insisting that the Swine Flu vaccines 'should be safe.' If they're so safe, why did HHS Secretary Sebelius give the manufacturers of the vaccines complete immunization and impunity from any reported side effects and deaths? The propaganda being pushed by the government is full of holes and lies.

Heavily populated areas, with a lot of children, teenagers, pregnant women, young and middle-aged adults are being targeted by the Government's propaganda program. Corporate media has begun admitting that the Swine Flu appears to be no more dangerous than the typical seasonal flu while pushing for vaccinations because the new virus -- that, again, was manufactured in a U.S. laboratory -- is likely to infect many more people because most have no immunity against it according to health officials. Every year health officials push for flu vaccinations and every year health officials inflate numbers to instill fear and push their propaganda which, so far, has repeatedly proven to be false and misleading. The only difference this year is that pharmaceutical companies are raking in billions of dollars, free of responsibility or blame for reactions and deaths caused by their hurriedly manufactured, improperly tested vaccines.

Vaccines using adjuvants -- to boost effectiveness or to create more doses -- have been used in Europe. Supposedly the Food and Drug Administration hasn't authorized their use in the United States, but as history has repeatedly proven, especially during the past eight and a half years, supervision and inspections of these products will be limited or non-existent. Just because the use of adjuvants is not 'authorized' in the U.S. does not mean that vaccines containing adjuvants will not be shipped or used in the U.S. Until the ingredients of these vaccines is made public -- if it's ever made public -- U.S. recipients of the vaccines will have no clue as to what they're being injected with. Some of the vaccines are also being produced with Squalene and various derivatives of Mercury which have proven deadly in the past.

As of yet, the Swine Flu vaccine injections are not mandatory in the U.S., unlike some other countries. However, the groundwork for instituting Marshall law and making vaccinations mandatory is in place. Some states such as Massachusetts are going a little overboard though. Allowing the WHO to circumvent procedures and manipulate the numbers in order to create a false Swine Flu pandemic only makes matters worse. As I've written before, the proliferating secrecy and Governmental deception surrounding the Swine Flu raises a lot of red flags and a lot of questions that have yet to be answered.

Manipulation of Scanty and Incomplete Swine Flu Data

Data collection regarding the Swine Flu has been scanty and incomplete. The CDC has reportedly acknowledged that what information was being collected in the U.S. were figures of 'confirmed and probable cases,' but there is no breakdown between 'confirmed' and 'probable' cases. In actuality, only a small percent of the reported cases were 'confirmed' by laboratory tests.

No attempts have been made to improve the data collection process or to confirm actual cases of the Swine Flu. Both the WHO and the CDC have decided that data collection of individual confirmed and probable cases was no longer necessary to ascertain the spread of the Swine Flu. Both agencies have made it easier to falsify information about Swine Flu outbreaks. Based on incomplete and scanty data, the WHO is predicting that as many as 2 billion people could become infected with the Swine Flu over the next two years. The WHO has conveniently -- albeit most likely criminally -- aided world governments in creating a Swine Flu pandemic.

As noted by The Centre for Research on Globalization, the statements of the WHO are notoriously contradictory. While creating an atmosphere of fear and insecurity, the WHO also acknowledged that the underlying symptoms are moderate and that 'most people will recover from the Swine Flu within a week, just as they would from seasonal forms of influenza. The spread of the H1N1 Swine Flu is not being evaluated through any concrete indicator.

Also noted by The Centre for Research on Globalization is that physicians and other health care professionals need to speak out and refute the statements of Government health officials who are acting on behalf of Big Pharma. We are dealing with a big lie being used to generate a worldwide vaccination program and world citizens need to target the political and corporate interests behind the manufactured Worldwide public health emergency. This emergency isn't intended to save lives or protect humanity. It's intended to decrease worldwide populations through the intentional creation of the Swine Flu pandemic.

Hidden World Agenda of Large Tax-exempt Foundations

As noted in this post from Human Beings First, there are many instances where the WHO -- which is largely funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, Ford Foundation, and the Rothschild group in London -- has tried to absolutely control populations for specific political purposes worldwide. There has been a hidden agenda for world government for years. Large tax-exempt foundations such as those mentioned above have been intentionally misleading and misinforming U.S. citizens for several decades. Videos of a Congressional investigation -- back when Congress wasn't nearly as corrupt and corporately owned as they are now -- of the hidden tax-exempt agenda can be found at Cosmo Learning.

The Swine Flu vaccinations appear to be another one of those programs that is designed to kill large amounts of people, as has happened in the past. It appears that it's going to be done by means of introducing another tainted vaccination program. Children have already become guinea pigs for the vaccination program.

History has revealed a pattern, the same modus operandi being used by many worldwide governments now: introduce a vaccine to unspecting world populations, cause massive sickness, massive death, massive panic, massive chaos, then they step in to complete the agenda. It's time to put an end to the secrecy and to the egregious crimes being committed by Government.

Government's Propaganda Alternating Between Ridiculous and Repugnant

As noted by Cryptogon, from a doctor's perspective, if the current Swine Flu virus becomes abnormally lethal, there are three possible explanations: an accidental release of the virus, an intentional release of the virus from a disgruntled lab employee, or -- probably the most realistic scenario -- that a group, corporation or government agency intentionally released the virus in the interests of profit and power.

Given all the stunts the U.S. government has pulled the last eight and a half years under President Bush, stunts that still continue under President Obama, there is a good probability that the last option could occur if it hasn't already. President Obama just picked up where President Bush left off on most of the egregious policies that were designed to intentionally destroy Democracy and America by corrupted politicians. Mr. 'hope and change' has repeatedly proven to be Mr. more of the same, and in some cases worse. Some of the 'Czars' -- such as Mark Lloyd, the FCC 'Diversity' Czar who, just last year advocated genocide against Americans -- that are appointed, with no oversight from Congress, by Obama, make one question Obama's intentions. Many of the things that were labeled as 'conspiracy theories' by cronies of the Bush cabal are proving to be quite accurate and true.

More on how the Swine Flu vaccines are more deadly than the Swine Flu -- and a lot of other information regarding the fraudulently created Swine Flu pandemic -- can be found in this article from The Centre for Research on Globalization.

If you are forced to take vaccine, it's recommended that you take the AstraZeneca nasal vaccine MedImmune so you'll avoid the side effects associated with Squalene, Mercury and a few other lethal adjuvants that will be used in some of the Swine Flu vaccines.

As also noted by Cryptogon, while most of the mainstream corporate media sensationalizes propaganda -- trying to scare everyone about the Swine Flu -- closer scrutiny of what passes as news reveals that the victims who have allegedly died from the Swine Flu have had underlying health problems and/or significant medical conditions. Now, as has proven true so many times before, the U.S. Government's propaganda is alternating between ridiculous and repugnant. Fortunately, now ordinary people are able to combat the propaganda and control the attempts made by the Government's propaganda programs and lies. It's long past time to remove the cancerous secret Government that has destroyed this country and other parts of the world and it's time to hold the criminals accountable.

SWINE FLU VACCINE’S DIRTY LITTLE SECRET EXPOSED

SWINE FLU VACCINE’S DIRTY LITTLE SECRET EXPOSED Print This Post
WARNING
Swine Flu Vaccine
We at the New Parenting.com Blog present this as a public service to all parents with children in the U.S.
All of this material is so important NOW and Dr. Mercola has totally covered it. My thanks
According to to him for thoroughly presenting all the information and references.
Squalene: the Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret ExposedKathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, your children should be the first target for mass swine flu vaccinations when school starts this fall.
This is a ridiculous assumption for many reasons, not to mention extremely high risk.
In Australia, where the winter season has begun, Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon is reassuring parents the swine flu is no more dangerous than regular seasonal flu. “Most people, including children, will experience very mild symptoms and recover without any medical intervention,” she said.
Sydney-based immunization specialist Robert Booy predicts swine flu might be fatal to about twice as many children in the coming year as regular influenza. Booy estimates 10-12 children could die from the H1N1 virus, compared with the five or six regular flu deaths seen among children in an average year in Australia.
“Cure the Disease, Kill the Patient”
Less than 100 children in the U.S. die each year from seasonal flu viruses. If we use Australia’s math, a very rough estimate would be another 100 children could potentially die of swine flu in the United States in the coming year, that’s a total of a possible 200 children.
If children are the first target group in the U.S. per Sebelius, that means we’re about to inject around 75 million children with a fast tracked vaccine containing novel adjuvants, including dangerous squalene, to prevent perhaps 100 deaths.
I’m not overlooking the tragedy of the loss of even one child to an illness like the H1N1 flu virus. But there can be no argument that unnecessary mass injection of millions of children with a vaccine containing an adjuvant known to cause a host of debilitating autoimmune diseases is a reckless, dangerous plan.
Why are Vaccinations Dangerous?
The presumed intent of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause illness and disease. However, your body’s immune system is already designed to do this in response to organisms which invade your body naturally.
Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, pulmonary system or your digestive tract – not through an injection.
These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body.
Your IgA immune system is your body’s first line of defense. Its job is to fight off invading organisms at their entry points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body’s immune system.
When a virus is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant like squalene, your IgA immune system is bypassed and your body’s immune system kicks into high gear in response to the vaccination.
Injecting organisms into your body to provoke immunity is contrary to nature.
And as if Vaccines Weren’t Dangerous Enough on Their Own …
… Imagine them turbocharged.
The main ingredient in a vaccine is either killed viruses or live ones that have been attenuated (weakened and made less harmful).
Flu vaccines can also contain a number of chemicals, including ethylene glycol (antifreeze), formaldehyde, phenol (carbolic acid) and even antibiotics like Neomycin and streptomycin.
In addition to the viruses and other additives, many vaccines also contain immune adjuvants like aluminum and squalene.
The purpose of an immune adjuvant added to a vaccine is to enhance (turbo charge) your immune response to the vaccination. Adjuvants cause your immune system to overreact to the introduction of the organism you’re being vaccinated against.
Adjuvants are supposed to get the job done faster (but certainly not more safely), which reduces the amount of vaccine required per dose, and the number of doses given per individual.
Less vaccine required per person means more individual doses available for mass vaccination campaigns. Coincidentally, this is exactly the goal of government and the pharmaceutical companies who stand to make millions from their vaccines.
Will There Be Immune Adjuvants in Swine Flu Vaccines?
The U.S. government has contracts with several drug companies to develop and produce swine flu vaccines. At least two of those companies, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, are using an adjuvant in their H1N1 vaccines.
The adjuvant? Squalene.
According to Meryl Nass, M.D., an authority on the anthrax vaccine,
“A novel feature of the two H1N1 vaccines being developed by companies Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline is the addition of squalene-containing adjuvants to boost immunogenicity and dramatically reduce the amount of viral antigen needed. This translates to much faster production of desired vaccine quantities.
Novartis’s proprietary squalene adjuvant for their H1N1 vaccine is MF59. Glaxo’s is ASO3. MF59 has yet to be approved by the FDA for use in any U.S. vaccine, despite its history of use in other countries.
Per Dr. Nass, there are only three vaccines in existence using an approved squalene adjuvant. None of the three are approved for use in the U.S.
What Squalene Does to Rats
Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time. A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis.
The researchers concluded the study raised questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.
What Squalene Does to Humans
Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.
The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.
Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system. Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) received anthrax vaccines which contained squalene MF59 (the Novartis squalene adjuvant) was an unapproved ingredient in experimental anthrax vaccines and has since been linked to the devastating autoimmune diseases suffered by countless Gulf War vets. The Department of Defense made every attempt to deny that squalene was indeed an added contaminant in the anthrax vaccine administered to Persian Gulf war military personnel – deployed and non-deployed – as well as participants in the more recent Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP).
However, the FDA discovered the presence of squalene in certain lots of AVIP product. A test was developed to detect anti-squalene antibodies in GWS patients, and a clear link was established between the contaminated product and all the GWS sufferers who had been injected with the vaccine containing squalene.
A study conducted at Tulane Medical School and published in the February 2000 issue of Experimental Molecular Pathology included these stunning statistics:
“ … the substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene.
In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene.” According to Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., a former principle research scientist for the government of Australia:
“… this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called “Gulf War Syndrome,” documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War.
The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.”

Post Vaccination Follow-Up Might as Well Be Non-Existent
There is virtually no science to support the safety of vaccine injections on your long-term health or the health of your children. Follow-up studies last on average about two weeks, and look only for glaring injuries and illnesses.
Autoimmune disorders like those seen in Gulf War Syndrome frequently take years to diagnose due to the vagueness of early symptoms. Complaints like headaches, fatigue and chronic aches and pains are symptoms of many different illnesses and diseases.
Don’t hold your breath waiting for vaccine purveyors and proponents to look seriously at the long-term health consequences of their vaccination campaigns.
What you can do: -
Visit the National Vaccination Information Center (NVIC.org) site and join in the fight against mandatory swine flu vaccinations.
Educate yourself about influenza strains, vaccination risks, and the public health laws in your state that may require you or your children to undergo either mandatory vaccination or quarantine.
Take care of your health to reduce or eliminate your risk of contracting the flu. The key is to keep your immune system strong by following these guidelines:
• Eliminate sugar and processed foods from your diet. Sugar consumption has an immediate, debilitating effect on your immune system.
• Take a high quality source of animal-based omega 3 fats like Krill Oil.
• Exercise. Your immune system needs good circulation in order to perform at its best for you.
• Optimize your vitamin D levels. Vitamin D deficiency is the likely cause of seasonal flu viruses. Getting an optimal level of vitamin D will help you fight infections of all kinds.
• Get plenty of good quality sleep.
• Deal with stress effectively. If you feel overwhelmed by stress, your body will not have the reserves it needs to fight infection.
• Wash your hands. But not with an antibacterial soap. Use a pure, chemical-free soap.

________________________________________
News Sources: Copy and paste into your browser.

USAToday.com, Swine flu shots may go to kids first, Sebelius says, June 16, 2009 http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2009-06-16-swine-flu-vaccine_N.htm
ABC.net.au, Health minister reassures parents over swine flu, July 2, 2009 http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2009/07/02/2614972.htm
Google News, AFP, Australia urges calm after child flu death, July 2, 2009, http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5hVoGSwV_jPgg6J6Aoz8wSQiGyosg
Meryl Nass, M.D., July 4, 2009 http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2009/07/h1n1-update-australiahong-kongus.html
Meryl Nass, M.D., July 3, 2009 http://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/2009/07/h1n1-vaccines-with-novel-adjuvants.html
Rense.com, Vaccines, Autism, and Gulf War Syndrome, August 15, 2005 http://www.rense.com/general67/vacc.htm
The American Journal of Pathology, The Endogenous Adjuvant Squalene Can Induce a Chronic T-Cell-Mediated Arthritis in Rats, 2000 http://ajp.amjpathol.org/cgi/content/abstract/156/6/2057
Vaccination Liberation, Adjuvant Index Page http://www.vaclib.org/basic/adjuvants.htm
Autoimmune Technologies, News Release: SQUALENE FOUND IN ANTHRAX VACCINE, http://www.autoimmune.com/SqualeneInVaccine.html
Autoimmune Technologies, Gulf War Syndrome: ANTI-SQUALENE ANTIBODIES LINK GULF WAR SYNDROME TO ANTHRAX VACCINE http://www.autoimmune.com/GWSGen.html
ScienceDirect.com, Experimental and Molecular Pathology, Volume 68, Issue 1, February 2000, Pages 55-64 http://www.sciencedirect.com/ Adverse Effects of Adjuvants in Vaccines, by Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., 2000 http://www.whale.to/vaccine/adjuvants.html
All of this material is so important NOW and Dr. Mercola has totally covered it. My thanks to him again for thoroughly presenting all the information and references.
We at the New Parenting present this as a public service to all parents with children in the U.S.

Did Big Pharma Just Try to Create a Mutant Flu Pandemic?

August 5, 2009
Did Big Pharma Just Try to Create a Mutant Flu Pandemic?

With all the media focus on a possible government takeover of health care, there’s something that scares me even more. There is open talk of forced vaccinations for the swine flu.

Don’t think it’s possible? Think again. I just saw a news report that the military has offered to assist in the event of a swine flu outbreak. Why the military? And why over what has been a relatively benign disease so far?

Well, that’s just the beginning. It gets far worse. In a story that most media outlets have ignored — except for Bloomberg.com — the Big Pharma company Baxter International distributed contaminated vaccines for swine flu to Austria and 3 neighboring countries. The vaccines contained the H5N1 avian flu virus. The Czech Republic just happened to catch the contamination. They tested a batch on ferrets before shipping it out for injection into humans. All of the ferrets died! It was a major scandal. Had they injected humans, we could be facing a disease that could kill millions.

The word “contamination” suggests an accident. But according to the extremely strict procedures for vaccine production, the “accidental” presence of live avian flu in a swine flu vaccine is an impossibility. It is so remote that some Czech newspapers speculated that Baxter was trying to provoke a pandemic. Such a pandemic would help it reap untold billions in profits from producing the vaccine to counter a bird flu outbreak.

Was it intentional? I can’t say for sure.

So am I scared? Yes. Of an outbreak? No. I have oxidation and plenty of other remedies ready to treat my family and many hundreds of people. I will serve them until I simply drop. No, I’m scared that our government will force us at gunpoint to have our bodies injected with only God knows what. I’m scared of all the horrific immune reactions, neurological complications, Alzheimer’s disease (from aluminum).

I have reported how state authorities have already forcibly rounded up children and forced them to get injections over the vigorous objections of parents. It has happened. And it can happen again.

The government is moving in on the most basic of rights, your body, in the interest of the “greater good.” Well, with nationalized health care, it will be the greater good to ration (deny) you health care when you reach 80. Don’t think it won’t happen.

I again urge you to do everything you can to demand your legislators to stop the madness with the government takeover of “medicine.” And tell them that you will not stand for forced vaccinations.

I have written about natural, effective ways to boost your immune system in past Health Alerts and the pages of my newsletter. You can read those articles at www.SecondOpinionNewsletter.com.

Who knows, you may be denied health care if you refuse to be vaccinated. But remember, it is far easier for me to treat any natural acute infection than permanent immune damage or Alzheimer’s caused by a vaccine.

Squalene—Is New Vaccine Additive the Worst Yet?

Squalene—Is New Vaccine Additive the Worst Yet?
by Heidi Stevenson
27 June 2009

Cover your arms, because a new and even worse vaccination assault may be upon Americans. Already approved to assault Europeans, an adjuvant—vaccine additive to increase its effect—called squalene is being added to boost the activity of the newer, weaker vaccines being developed because...well, that's interesting, isn't it? Why produce attenuated vaccines if the older varieties weren't dangerous? Hmmm...that's a question we're probably not supposed to ask. So, let's just just ignore it.

Squalene is a natural chemical. Your body needs it to function properly; your body even produces it. It's commonly purchased in health food stores as shark oil. That, of course, is how it's justified. However, a detail that's ignored is the crucial point. Ingesting squalene by eating it does not compare with bypassing the alimentary tract and injecting it directly into your tissues. Take, for example, stomach acid. It's very strong hydrochloric acid, and we can't live without it. But you wouldn't want anyone to inject it into your arm, would you?

Squalene enhances the immune system. It's thought that adding it to vaccines will help boost their effectiveness. At first glance, it sounds good and even seems to make sense. However, squalene has a history.

It should be noted that there is research that purports to document no connection between squalene and antibody responses. Note first that the study in question(1)limits itself to only two of the five types of antibodies. More egregiously, note that the study was not only financed by Novartis Vaccines, which makes the adjuvant squalene-containing adjuvant, but the author is employed by them.Squalene's Effects and the Anthrax Vaccine
It's been tested to see what happens when injected into animals. The results are, quite frankly, ugly. In many tests, mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs have been injected with squalene. It has caused pathogenic cells in lymph nodes, and rheumatoid arthritis, lupus erythematosus, and other autoimmune diseases.

Gulf War Syndrome has devastated the lives of many victims. Though not definitive, since depleted uranium has also been implicated, the experience of the affected soldiers led them to believe that it was the result of anthrax vaccinations. Health problems they've suffered have included lymphadenopathy, rheumatoid arthritis, nervous system injuries, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, malar rashes (typically seen in lupus), skin lesions that don't heal, memory loss, seizures, Sjögren's syndrome, Raynaud's disease, chronic headaches, multiple sclerosis, and other conditions.


Although a common technique for evading responsibility is to cast doubt on another potential etiology, such as depleted uranium in this case, that does not necessarily absolve the first potential cause; it can certainly be that both are factors. In the case of Gulf War Syndrome, the US Department of Defense (DoD) went on a campaign of denial. They denied that they'd added squalene. For years, they denied and belittled the idea that squalene could even cause such problems(2).

Then, in 2000, the FDA announced that it had found squalene in the DoD's anthrax vaccines. Though the concentration is small, it's enough to result in the symptoms that Gulf War vets were suffering from. Since then, the DoD has admitted that squalene was in the vaccines, though continues to deny that it was purposefully put there. There is no doubt, though, that the DoD did 28 trials of vaccines with squalene. According to a report by the GAO(2) on page 2, "DOD officials stated that they considered, but decided against using vaccines with adjuvant formulations—including those with squalene—to protect Gulf War troops."

What's strange about this is the DoD's continuing claims that squalene is safe. Which is it? Does the DoD believe that squalene is too dangerous to use as an adjuvant, or is their claim that squalene is safe?

In the same GAO report on page 22 is a copy of a letter from the DoD to the GAO. It complains of the report's recommendation that Gulf War veterans be tested for squalene antibodies on their blood. Why? This has all the merits of stonewalling, just as the DoD's responses about squalene in anthrax vaccines were throughout the investigations.

Theory of Squalene's Action
The fact that squalene is a biological compound naturally found in the body is likely the reason it can be so dangerous when injected. When eaten or self-manufactured, squalene arrives in a normal way that doesn't arouse the immune system. However, if the immune system comes into contact with it in conjunction with the injury of injection, it can be taken as an intruder. This sensitizes the immune system into attacking squalene anywhere it's found, thus starting a process of self-destruction, the very definition of an autoimmune disorder.

Current Status of Squalene
Squalene is approved for use in the European Union, and is now included in the Novartis adjuvant called MF59. This adjuvant is used in the EU-approved influenza vaccine.

The FDA has approved fast tracking for development of influenza vaccines. Pharmaceutical corporations Sinovac, Baxter, and Novartis have all announced their plans to have their vaccines available by this autumn. All of them will use an adjuvant. Novartis, which manufactures squalene-based MF59, recently announced that it's weeks ahead of schedule.

The FDA has not approved squalene. That, however, does not appear to have any meaning. In May this year, the US Department of Health and Human Services ordered $289 million of Novartis's squalene-based MF59.

I'll leave it to the reader to guess whether squalene will be included in America's influenza vaccinations.

This Statement concerns our research with anti-squalene antibodies, including the discovery of these antibodies in the blood of patients with Gulf War

Saturday, August 29, 2009




About Us

Areas of Research

Laboratory Tests

News Releases

Contact Us

Resources

Home




STATEMENT FOR HEARING RECORD
The House Subcommittee on National Security, Veterans Affairs, and International Relations


Hearing date: January 24, 2002

Submitted by: Robert F. Garry, Ph.D., Professor
Department of Microbiology and Immunology
Tulane Medical School, Room 568 JBJ
1430 Tulane Avenue
New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Date submitted: December 21, 2001

SUMMARY

This Statement concerns our research with anti-squalene antibodies, including the discovery of these antibodies in the blood of patients with Gulf War illness. Our published data and additional data which has been accepted for publication strongly suggests that Gulf War illness is closely associated with an abnormal immune response to squalene indicated by the presence of these antibodies. Our research also links specific lots of anthrax vaccine known to contain squalene to the production of anti-squalene antibodies. In addition, our research demonstrates that the blood test for detecting these antibodies, the anti-squalene antibody assay, may be an excellent tool to aid in the diagnosis of Gulf War illness.

U.S. Army researchers have verified our discovery of the antibodies and, in May of this year, submitted a patent application covering their anti-squalene antibody work. Our patent, U.S. Patent No. 6,214,566, "Method for Detecting Anti-Squalene Antibodies," which we believe covers the same technology, had already issued in April of this year. The Army researchers have made a disingenuous attempt to discredit our work, and they have not yet published any studies designed to confirm our discovery of a link between the antibodies and Gulf War illness, though they state that such studies may be feasible.

We believe that such confirmatory studies and additional studies should be undertaken without delay. We also believe that the anti-squalene antibody assay should immediately be made available under government sponsorship to all physicians interested in using it to investigate the condition of their Gulf War illness patients.


DATA AND OBSERVATIONS

Research data which we published in February 2000 strongly suggests that anti-squalene antibodies are closely associated with Gulf War illness. Specifically, we found in our study participants that 95% of the Gulf War veterans with Gulf War illness and 100% of the non- deployed veterans with Gulf War illness were positive for the presence of anti-squalene antibodies, while 0% of the healthy deployed veterans were positive. Additional research data which has now been accepted for publication shows, in a limited number of samples tested, that an increased prevalence of anti-squalene antibodies in Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP) personnel correlated with administration of lots of anthrax vaccine subsequently shown by the FDA to contain trace amounts of squalene. Our results strongly suggest that the production of anti-squalene antibodies is linked to symptoms of Gulf War illness and to the presence of squalene found in certain lots of anthrax vaccine.

Though the source of the squalene in the vaccine lots has not, to my knowledge, been identified, squalene is used as an adjuvant in animal vaccines. The use of squalene as an adjuvant in human vaccines has not been approved, and human exposure to squalene in vaccines has been shown by others to cause immunological symptoms similar to those found in Gulf War illness patients.

Gulf War illness is present both in Gulf War veterans who were deployed to the Persian Gulf War theater of operations and in personnel who were not deployed, including personnel who never left the United States. The absence of an association between the presence of Gulf War illness and deployment indicates that the causative agent or factor is not associated with the Persian Gulf. Consistent with this observation are the results of a recent epidemiological study finding that vaccinations that were given to both deployed and non-deployed personnel are associated with ill health.

U.S. Army researchers have confirmed our discovery that anti-squalene antibodies do exist and can reliably be detected, and the Army researchers published this work in November 2000. Army representatives filed a U.S. patent application covering anti-squalene antibody technology on May 18, 2001, and we believe that the technology for which the patent was filed is the same technology that was described in the November 2000 article.

A U.S. patent covering our anti-squalene antibody technology issued as of April 10, 2001. The patent is assigned to Tulane University and is licensed to a New Orleans biomedical company. We believe that the claims awarded in the Tulane patent cover the work that was published by the Army researchers. On May 23, 2001, Tulane's licensee wrote a letter to the Department of Defense offering to sublicense this patented technology to the Army so that the Army researchers could perform a study designed to confirm whether the antibodies are linked to Gulf War illness. An Army representative declined this offer on June 6, 2001.

The journal that published the November 2000 article by the Army researchers received the submitted article on April 18, 2000. The material submitted to the journal on that date demonstrated that the Army researchers had confirmed our discovery of anti-squalene antibodies. In June 2000, one of these same researchers, an Army colonel, published a letter to the editor of the journal which had published our original article in February 2000. In the June 2000 letter, the colonel stated that our published results constituted a "new, unproven assay that claims to detect a novel antibody." The colonel made this statement despite the fact that he had already confirmed our discovery and had already submitted his findings for publication. Further, when the colonel's article appeared in November 2000, it cited his own letter of June 2000 to call our original findings into question. The colonel's letter expressing an opinion which he himself had already proven to be baseless was thus used twice in efforts to discredit our work.

The last paragraph of the November 2000 article published by the Army researchers reads as follows:
"With the development of the ELISA using PVDF membranes, as described in this paper, it may now be possible to undertake studies with serum from sick and healthy individuals to determine whether naturally-occurring antibodies to SQE [squalene] exist, and whether the appearance or amounts of such antibodies have any relationship to normal physiologic functions or whether they are associated with any illness."

With the serum samples available to the Army researchers, such studies would in our opinion be very straightforward and would take a short amount of time to complete. The Army has had its own version of the necessary test available for more than two years but has published no such studies.

Based on the Army's actions with respect to our work, we suspect that the Army has in fact conducted these studies and elected not to publish them. Our published research makes a compelling case that, first, anti-squalene antibodies exist, and second, that there is a link between the antibodies and Gulf War illness. Before the publication date of our research, some of our research data was discussed in a GAO report to the Honorable Jack Metcalf entitled Gulf War Illnesses: Questions about the Presence of Anti-Squalene Antibodies Can Be Resolved (GAO/NSIAD-99-5, March 1999). The GAO report specifically recommended that the DoD conduct its own research designed to replicate or dispute our results. The colonel's research group subsequently published a confirmatory study that looked only at our first finding and ignored the second. A confirmatory study of our second finding would be very easy for the Army to do in a short time, and we find it difficult to believe that the colonel's group has not already done such a study, since any good and inquisitive scientist with ready access to test samples would want to do it. Instead of following the GAO's recommendation, however, the colonel chose to publicly ignore our second finding and to make misleading public statements that denigrated our work. Later, when the Army and the colonel were offered the opportunity to license our technology and finish the confirmatory work, they declined the offer.

The presence of anti-squalene antibodies in ill people and the absence of the antibodies in healthy people is the first hard laboratory evidence that Gulf War illness is what some might refer to as a "real disease." It is also the first evidence that an abnormal immunological response is under way in Gulf War illness patients. The anti-squalene antibody assay thus represents the first laboratory test for Gulf War illness. As such we believe that it has great clinical value as a diagnostic aid, and it suggests that therapies designed to modulate the immune response to antigens should be investigated in patients with Gulf War illness.

Recent unpublished observations from the Veterans Administration indicate that there is a significant increase in the prevalence of the neuro-degenerative disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) in Gulf War veterans. The data that we published in February 2000 shows that some of the patients who were ill with Gulf War illness and who tested positive on the anti-squalene antibody assay exhibited neurological symptoms. These results suggest that a possible relationship between anti-squalene antibodies and ALS in Gulf War veterans may exist and should be investigated.

Further research with the anti-squalene antibody assay continues on a limited scale using private funds, but the test is not currently available to individual physicians for investigation into the conditions of their patients. More than two years have now elapsed since DoD researchers have had access to a version of this test. While the DoD has proceeded with an attempt to win its own patent on the test, in our opinion it has done nothing with the test to help any Gulf War illness patient. It is therefore our very strong recommendation that an agency of the U.S. government immediately commission a large study of anti-squalene antibodies and Gulf War era veterans and other personnel, including appropriate ALS patients. Such an investigation should be conducted in the context of, or coordinated with, a population-based study of Gulf War era veterans similar to the ongoing and successful Ranch Hand study of Agent Orange. It is our further very strong recommendation that an agency of the U.S. government immediately begin to provide the anti-squalene antibody assay to all physicians treating patients with Gulf War illness.


REFERENCE INFORMATION

(1) Our initial study concerning anti-squalene antibodies was published in the February 2000 issue of Experimental and Molecular Pathology. The results of this study strongly suggest two things: (1) that humans can indeed raise serum antibodies against squalene, and (2) that, in the people studied, the presence of the antibodies correlated very closely with the presence of the symptoms of Gulf War illness both in personnel who had been deployed to the Persian Gulf theater and in personnel who had not been deployed there. A copy of this article, entitled "Antibodies to Squalene in Gulf War Syndrome," is attached hereto ("the Asa/Garry article").

(2) The anthrax bacillus is incapable of producing squalene, and squalene is not present as a constituent of the growth medium used to produce the organism for the anthrax vaccine. Squalene is widely used as a vaccine adjuvant in animals, but it is clearly harmful to many humans when used in that manner and is not approved for use in human vaccines.

(3) A letter to the editor published in the June 2000 issue of Experimental and Molecular Pathology addresses the work presented in the Asa/Garry article. The letter attempts to find fault with our testing technique, calling our test a "... new, unproven assay that claims to detect a novel antibody ...."

The letter further states the following:
"The conclusions of Asa and colleagues, purporting to correlate anti-squalene [sic] with Gulf War illnesses, in our opinion, rely on circular logic. Positive results with an assay not previously validated cannot be used as scientific proof that antibodies to the antigen exist in samples of unknowns. It is premature to proceed directly to testing serum samples from healthy people and sick people before conducting the fundamental validation steps."

This letter was written by Col. Carl Alving of the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research and John Grabenstein of the U.S. Army Medical Command. A copy of this letter ("the Alving/Grabenstein letter"), together with our published response and an editorial note, is attached hereto.

(4) In the November 2000 issue of the Journal of Immunological Methods, four researchers from the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, including Col. Alving, published an article confirming that anti-squalene antibodies do exist and can reliably be detected. The study described in this article reproduces and expands upon our work and validates our anti-squalene antibody assay. A copy of this article, entitled "Induction and Detection of Antibodies to Squalene," is attached hereto ("the Alving article").

(5) A notation by the Journal of Immunological Methods which appears under the title line at the top of the Alving article states that the manuscript for the article was received by the journal from Col. Alving and his colleagues on 18 April 2000. The Alving/Grabenstein letter was published six weeks later, in June 2000. This means that when Col. Alving and his colleague Grabenstein were publicly characterizing our test as a "... new, unproven assay that claims to detect a novel antibody ...," Col. Alving and his other colleagues had already written the Alving article confirming that the new antibodies did in fact exist.

(6) The note from the journal's editors which accompanies the Alving/Grabenstein letter points out that this letter "... relates to methodology. Drs. Alving and Grabenstein offer no data against the conclusions of Asa et al."

Since the Alving article confirms that the novel antibody was indeed discovered by our detection method, the Alving/Grabenstein letter is therefore rendered entirely meaningless by the Alving article. Despite this, the Alving article includes the following paragraph:

"What, if any are the potential consequences of induction of antibodies to SQE [squalene]? A recent publication claims to have detected antibodies to SQE in sick but not in healthy individuals (Asa et al., 2000) [the Asa/Garry article]. However, we believe that such a conclusion may be premature, based on a technical critique of the reported Western blot-type assay that was used (Alving and Grabenstein, 2000) [the Alving/Grabenstein letter]."

The Alving article thus cites the Alving/Grabenstein letter, which the Alving article itself refutes, to call into question our second discovery, that the anti-squalene antibodies we discovered are found in sick but not healthy individuals.

(7) After the Asa/Garry article was published, we learned that in June 1999, investigators at the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had assayed the Department of Defense's anthrax vaccine for the presence of squalene. Using a sensitive gas-liquid chromatography procedure, the FDA had identified squalene in certain lot numbers (FAV 020, 030, 038, 043 and 047) of the vaccine. Although the amounts of squalene found in these lots of the vaccine by the FDA were small (parts per billion), in principle even these small amounts may have been sufficient to induce in some vaccine recipients the immune response that is now being manifested by the presence of anti-squalene antibodies. The published work of other researchers has strongly linked exposure to the anthrax vaccine and other vaccines to the development of Gulf War illnesses. Moreover, many pathological effects of exposure to squalene-containing vaccine adjuvants are well known to rheumatologists, and a number of these pathologies bear striking similarity to the signs and symptoms displayed by some ill Gulf War era veterans.

(8) On April 10, 2001, U.S. Patent No. 6,214,566, "Method for Detecting Anti-Squalene Antibodies," was awarded and assigned to Tulane University. A copy of this patent is attached. Tulane has licensed the anti-squalene antibody technology to Autoimmune Technologies, LLC of New Orleans. On May 23, 2001, the LLC Manager of that firm wrote a letter to The Secretary of Defense with a copy to Col. Alving offering to sublicense the patented technology to Department of Defense researchers. On June 6, 2001, an intellectual property counsel of the Army wrote back to decline the offer. Copies of both the May 23rd and the June 6th letters are attached.

(9) On October 22, 2001, in accordance with 37 CFR 404.6, the Department of the Army filed a notice of the "Availability for Non-Exclusive, Exclusive, or Partially Exclusive Licensing of U.S. Patent Application No. 09/859,389 entitled 'Detection of Antibodies to Squalene in Serum' filed May 18, 2001." On November 8, 2001, the LLC Manager of Autoimmune Technologies spoke on the telephone with the patent attorney and the licensing officer at Fort Detrick who were administering this license. Neither the attorney nor the licensing officer was aware of the existence of U.S. Patent No. 6,214,566, and neither person knew whether U.S. Patent Application No. 09/859,389 was based upon the work done by Col. Alving and his colleagues. The LLC Manager pointed out to both of them that, in our opinion, the work done and published by Col. Alving's group is covered by the claims awarded in U.S. Patent No. 6,214,566. The LLC Manager also asked for further information about the technology which the Army was proposing to license. As of December 18, 2001, the LLC Manager had not received this additional information, and he wrote a letter on that date to both the attorney and the licensing officer. A copy of that letter is attached.



This material is not intended to take the place of a physician's advice.

Swine Flu Vaccination Poses Serious Threat to Your Health

Swine Flu Vaccination Poses Serious Threat to Your Health

The US does not allow any exemptions from mandatory vaccinations.

21 June 2009: Change the word anthrax vaccine with flu vaccine and see your own possible sufferings (video). Squalene is in both insufficiently tested vaccines. Here is an ominous statement by the Chicago Tribune on Apr. 25, 2009: "Baxter has patented technology that allows the company to develop vaccines in half the time it usually takes – about 13 weeks instead of 26"!!!

Remember, it was Baxter which recently delivered seasonal flu vaccine to 18 countries with deadly bird flu - discovered by coincidence.

However, the New World Order terror propaganda campaign is increasing: The Independent 21. Juni 2009: The UK Health Department again announces that 40% of the population could be attacked by swine flu - and cost global domestic Product 2.5 trillion dollars - even though so far only 400 British have benn infected!!

Global Research 13 June: It looks like governments around the world will either force these vaccinations on the public or launch a massive propaganda campaign to trick you into submitting to a jab. If they attempt to force these untested and essentially experimental vaccinations on you, cite the Nuremberg Code, which states: “The voluntary consent of the human subject is essential.” No experimental vaccine should be “conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur, except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as a subjects.

Associated Press 16 June 2009
Schools are being put on notice that they might even be turned into shot clinics. Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said Tuesday she is urging school superintendents around the country to spend the summer preparing for that possibility. No decision has been made yet on whether and how to vaccinate millions of Americans against the new flu strain that the World Health Organization last week formally dubbed a pandemic, meaning it now is circulating the globe unchecked. But the U.S. is pouring money into development of a vaccine in anticipation of giving at least some people the shots.

ATTENTION, Please: The WHO has declared swine flu (N1H1) pandemic. This will probably imply governmental demands for universal mass vaccinations under penalty for not complying. Flu vaccine contains squalene oil as an adjuvant.
Micropaleontologist Dr. Viera Scheibner conducted research into the adverse effects of adjuvants in vaccines and wrote: Squalene “contributed to the cascade of reactions called “ Gulf War syndrome. GIs developed arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, deadly Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Raynaud’s phenomenon with paroxysms of lack of blood in fingers and toes in fingers and toes, Sjorgren’s syndrome with blurred vision, chronic diarrhea, night sweats and low-grade fever.”

Wikipedia A study linking squalene, as experimental vaccine adjuvant, to individuals with the clinical signs of Gulf War syndrome was published in 2002. A U.S. Federal Judge ruled that there was good cause to believe aqualene to be harmful, and he ordered the Pentagon to stop administering it in October 2004.

Something peculiar is going on: The Bilderberg meeting wanted to appoint the WHO as the Health Ministry of the UN world government. Now an unprecedented hype is taking place: A non-existing risk of a pandemic flu is being blown up out of all proportions by the WHO – and without any measures being taken! Does this New World Order organisation with a very dubious reputation (its first director was Brock Chisholm – founder of the World Federation for Mental Hygiene, which has scuppered our culture) play a trump card to promote itself in the New World Order? It might be inspired by looking at the successes based on lies like the climate lie, the home made terrorism, and now the also home made financial crisis as for financial gains and promotion of the New World Order. Then the conclusion that you can really achieve great results in terms of world government by mendacious scaremongering seems inevitable!!

The WHO declares the first pandemic in the 21. century
Reuters 11 June 2009 The World Health Organization declared the first flu pandemic of the 21st century on Thursday, urging countries to shore up defenses against the virus which is "not stoppable" but has proved mainly mild so far. However the WHO imposed no restrictions on travels or contacts between people.

"Moving to pandemic phase six level does not imply we will see an increase in the number of deaths or very severe cases.The WHO recommended drugmakers stay on track to complete production of seasonal influenza vaccine for the northern hemisphere's next winter in the next two weeks. Each year, normal flu kills up to 500,000 people and infects millions.

The Times 11 June 2009: So far it has caused relatively mild, cold-like symptoms with headaches and vomiting, with only 141 deaths among 27,737 cases in 74 countries worldwide since March, In Britain, the number of confirmed cases has risen steadily to 797, with about 40 fresh cases a day.

Deutsche Welle 11 June, 2009: UN Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon:Our best response is a firm demonstration of global solidarity."

This pandemic is a hype
The EU sponsored Blogactiv on 06/05/09 quotes the Washington Post of 27 April, 2009 (now removed from the web) “The media hype is not in any scale to the real threat, it can be good entertainment like circus in ancient Rome and a tool to put the common people’s focus on trivialities."

The following is from an article by Stephen Lendman 10 June 2009 on the Global Research

The industry-run US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notoriously rushes inadequately tested drugs to market, putting their efficacy and safety into question, and turning those who use them into lab rats. It includes everyone if a mass vaccination is ordered on the mere claim of a public emergency - no proof required.
If mass vaccinations are ordered, millions of Americans may ask: Why have you willfully and maliciously ruined my health?

Dangerous side effects of flu vaccinations due to vaccine adjuvant squalene
Imunologist Dr. Pamela Asa first recognized autoimmune diseases showing up in GIs that mirrored those in lab animals injected with oil formulated squalene adjuvants.
According to Matsumoto, today, “Squalene adjuvants are a key ingredient in a whole new generation of vaccines intended for mass immunization around the globe. Squalene is not just a molecule found in a knee or elbow - it is found throughout the nervous system and the brain.” When injected in the body, the immune system attacks it as an enemy to be eliminated. Eating and digesting squalene isn’t a problem. But injecting it “galvanize(s) the immune system into attacking it, which can produce self-destructive cross reactions against the same molecule in the places where it occurs naturally in the body - and where it is critical to the health of the nervous system.” Once self-destruction begins, it doesn’t stop as the body keeps making the molecule that the immune system is trained to attack and destroy.

Matsumoto says “Squalene is a kind of trigger for (a) real biological weapon,” what Soviet researchers called “a biological time bomb!!” He and Dr. Pam Asa conclude that “Oil adjuvants are the most insidious chemical weapon ever devised,” including ones with squalene. So what American scientists conceived as a vaccine booster (or what’s now being developed in labs) was another ‘nano-bomb,’ instigating chronic, unpredictable and debilitating disease. Using squalene in vaccines is outlandish and criminal.
Gary Matsumoto is a New York-based award-winning investigative journalist. His 2004 book, “Vaccine A: The Covert Government Experiment That’s Killing Our Soldiers and Why GIs are Only the First Victims” took sharp issue with IOM results and the Pentagon’s denial of Gulf War syndrome.

Investigating the shadowy vaccination development world, he discovered US military-employed doctors and scientists conducted secret medical experiments on US citizens in violation of the Nuremberg Code and fundamental medical ethics.
According to Matsumoto, the Pentagon violated these and other standards, betrayed the troops, and the fundamental duty of military and civilian leaders to protect them. Since at least 1987, biowarfare development trumped the welfare of tens of thousands of GIs used as human guinea pigs for inoculation with experimental unlicensed anthrax vaccines containing squalene - administered involuntarily without disclosure of its harmful effects to human health.

Matsumoto wrote:
“The unethical experiments detailed in this book are ongoing, with little prospect of being self-limiting because they have been shielded from scrutiny and public accountability by national security concerns.”
Other research shows that squalene is the experimental anthrax vaccine ingredient that caused devastating autoimmune diseases and deaths for many Gulf War veterans from the US, UK, and Australia,
yet it continues in use today and for new vaccines development in labs.

“There are now data in more than two dozen peer-reviewed scientific papers, from ten different laboratories in the US, Europe, Asia and Australia, documenting that squalene-based adjuvants can induce autoimmune diseases in animals…observed in mice, rats, guinea pigs and rabbits.

Matsumoto’s book includes numerous case studies of GIs afflicted with one or more of the above syndromes, their devastating effects, and the outlandish US government reaction - failing to acknowledge their existence or a connection between them and administered vaccines. Also denying the effects of other toxic Gulf theater exposures (like depleted uranium) as well as withholding meaningful treatments or protocols.
Money above others´health

So why does Washington sanction its use? According to Matsumoto: “scientists in the United States are now literally invested in squalene.

Disturbingly, many of the cutting-edge vaccines currently in development by the NIH and its corporate partners contain squalene in one formulation or another. There is squalene in the prototype recombinant vaccines for HIV, malaria, herpes, influenza (including the swine strain), cytomegalovirus and human papillomavirus.” Some of these “are intended for mass immunization(s) around the globe” and that possibility should terrify everyone enough to refuse any mandate or doctor’s prescription to take them."

Comment
Now the WHO hype is aimed at provoking mass hysteria over a non existing threat to humanity: Swine flu, a much milder A flu than seasonal flu. Such politically created hoax will probably be associated with mandatory mass vaccinations for no medical reason – but for the enormous profits of the New World order corporations and their “scientists” - as well as for global/political reasons.

The vaccine carries a risk of very serious complications. Firstly we remember the Bayer´s contaminations of products for hemophiliacswith AIDS virus and this year Baxter´s contamination of seasonal flu vaccine with deadly bird flu virus.
However, there is also a very serious problem with the adjuvant of the vaccine: the oil squalene, which is said to have caused the “Gulf Syndrome.”

Is there a connection to the illuminist and self-conceited world elite´s depopulation programme in their bid for their own luciferian “godhood”?

Here is an excerpt of what I wrote on Jan 18, 2009: In the 1990’s the UN’s World Health Organization launched a campaign to vaccinate millions of women in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines between the ages of 15 and 45, allegedly against Tentanus. The vaccine was not given to men or boys!

It was revealed by a Catholic organisation that the Tetanus vaccine contained human Chorionic Gonadotrophin or hCG, a natural hormone which when combined with a tetanus toxoid carrier stimulated antibodies rendering a woman incapable of maintaining a pregnancy. None of the women vaccinated were told.It later came out that the Rockefeller Foundation along with the Rockefeller Population Council , the World Bank (home to CGIAR – a Rockefeller agricultural control organzation), and the United States’ National Institutes of Health had been involved. In addition, the Government of Norway, the host to the Svalbard Doomsday Seed Vault , donated $41 million to develop the special abortive Tetanus vaccine. Global Research 11 June 2009: ‘A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.’ – Ted Turner to Audubon Magazine, 1996.

Motives for this pandemic hype
Do I have to reiterate that bilderbergers and CFRs like the former US Defence Secretaries Donald Rumsfeld and George Shultz have shares in the the Tamiflu-producing corporatin, Gilead, being on its board, Rumsfeld even as chairman 1997–2001? They now have a serious problen: The seasonal H1N1 has mutated into a form that resists the Tamiflu , although it is still susceptible to the Relenza (Glaxo-Smith-Kline) alternative. So, for these greedy New World Order charlatans it is vital to hype a swine flu pandemic. For swine flu virus is susceptible to Tamiflu!!! And the sale of it is now soaring !!

The WHO will now recommend that pharmaceutical companies make swine flu vaccine.The U.S. government has already increased the availability of flu-fighting medicines and authorized $1 billion for developing a new swine flu vaccine. There is big money in this – and big opportunities to promote the WHO to be the health ministry of the New World order UN-government! The Council on Foreign Relations 12 June 2009: "What now kicks in is a greater sense of urgency for the pharmaceutical industry," says CFR Senior Fellow for Global Health Laurie Garrett

"Now that pandemic has been declared, more and more countries will guarantee that they will purchase vaccine if it is available, and WHO and World Bank will guarantee to purchase for the poorest countries in the world."

The Irish Times 13 June 2009: It would cost about €80 million to purchase a vaccine against the swine flu.

It had long been predicted that the WHO would declare the swine flu to be a level-six pandemic!!

Dare you let yourself be vaccinated against a harmles flu virus – much less harmful than seasonal flu – by money– and powergrasping New World Order psychopaths?

Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed

Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed


By Dr. Mercola

According to Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, your children should be the first target for mass swine flu vaccinations when school starts this fall.[i]

This is a ridiculous assumption for many reasons, not to mention extremely high risk.

In Australia, where the winter season has begun, Federal Health Minister Nicola Roxon is reassuring parents the swine flu is no more dangerous than regular seasonal flu. "Most people, including children, will experience very mild symptoms and recover without any medical intervention," she said.[ii]

Sydney-based immunization specialist Robert Booy predicts swine flu might be fatal to about twice as many children in the coming year as regular influenza. Booy estimates 10-12 children could die from the H1N1 virus, compared with the five or six regular flu deaths seen among children in an average year in Australia.[iii]

“Cure the Disease, Kill the Patient”

Less than 100 children in the U.S. die each year from seasonal flu viruses.[iv] If we use Australia’s math, a very rough estimate would be another 100 children could potentially die of swine flu in the United States in the coming year.

If children are the first target group in the U.S. per Sebelius, that means we’re about to inject around 75 million children with a fast tracked vaccine containing novel adjuvants, including dangerous squalene, to prevent perhaps 100 deaths.

I’m not overlooking the tragedy of the loss of even one child to an illness like the H1N1 flu virus. But there can be no argument that unnecessary mass injection of millions of children with a vaccine containing an adjuvant known to cause a host of debilitating autoimmune diseases is a reckless, dangerous plan.

Why are Vaccinations Dangerous?


The presumed intent of a vaccination is to help you build immunity to potentially harmful organisms that cause illness and disease. However, your body’s immune system is already designed to do this in response to organisms which invade your body naturally.

Most disease-causing organisms enter your body through the mucous membranes of your nose, mouth, pulmonary system or your digestive tract – not through an injection.

These mucous membranes have their own immune system, called the IgA immune system. It is a different system from the one activated when a vaccine is injected into your body.

Your IgA immune system is your body’s first line of defense. Its job is to fight off invading organisms at their entry points, reducing or even eliminating the need for activation of your body’s immune system.

When a virus is injected into your body in a vaccine, and especially when combined with an immune adjuvant like squalene, your IgA immune system is bypassed and your body’s immune system kicks into high gear in response to the vaccination.

Injecting organisms into your body to provoke immunity is contrary to nature, and vaccination carries enormous potential to do serious damage to your health.

And as if Vaccines Weren’t Dangerous Enough on Their Own …

… imagine them turbocharged.

The main ingredient in a vaccine is either killed viruses or live ones that have been attenuated (weakened and made less harmful).

Flu vaccines can also contain a number of chemical toxins, including ethylene glycol (antifreeze), formaldehyde, phenol (carbolic acid) and even antibiotics like Neomycin and streptomycin.

In addition to the viruses and other additives, many vaccines also contain immune adjuvants like aluminum and squalene.

The purpose of an immune adjuvant added to a vaccine is to enhance (turbo charge) your immune response to the vaccination. Adjuvants cause your immune system to overreact to the introduction of the organism you’re being vaccinated against.

Adjuvants are supposed to get the job done faster (but certainly not more safely), which reduces the amount of vaccine required per dose, and the number of doses given per individual.

Less vaccine required per person means more individual doses available for mass vaccination campaigns. Coincidentally, this is exactly the goal of government and the pharmaceutical companies who stand to make millions from their vaccines.

Will There Be Immune Adjuvants in Swine Flu Vaccines?

The U.S. government has contracts with several drug companies to develop and produce swine flu vaccines. At least two of those companies, Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline, are using an adjuvant in their H1N1 vaccines.

The adjuvant? Squalene.

According to Meryl Nass, M.D., an authority on the anthrax vaccine,

“A novel feature of the two H1N1 vaccines being developed by companies Novartis and GlaxoSmithKline is the addition of squalene-containing adjuvants to boost immunogenicity and dramatically reduce the amount of viral antigen needed. This translates to much faster production of desired vaccine quantities.”[v]

Novartis’s proprietary squalene adjuvant for their H1N1 vaccine is MF59. Glaxo’s is ASO3. MF59 has yet to be approved by the FDA for use in any U.S. vaccine, despite its history of use in other countries.

Per Dr. Nass, there are only three vaccines in existence using an approved squalene adjuvant. None of the three are approved for use in the U.S.

What Squalene Does to Rats

Oil-based vaccination adjuvants like squalene have been proved to generate concentrated, unremitting immune responses over long periods of time.[vi]

A 2000 study published in the American Journal of Pathology demonstrated a single injection of the adjuvant squalene into rats triggered “chronic, immune-mediated joint-specific inflammation,” also known as rheumatoid arthritis.[vii]

The researchers concluded the study raised questions about the role of adjuvants in chronic inflammatory diseases.

What Squalene Does to Humans

Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.

The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.

Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system.[viii]

Gulf War veterans with Gulf War Syndrome (GWS) received anthrax vaccines which contained squalene.[ix] MF59 (the Novartis squalene adjuvant) was an unapproved ingredient in experimental anthrax vaccines and has since been linked to the devastating autoimmune diseases suffered by countless Gulf War vets.[x]

The Department of Defense made every attempt to deny that squalene was indeed an added contaminant in the anthrax vaccine administered to Persian Gulf war military personnel – deployed and non-deployed – as well as participants in the more recent Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (AVIP).

However, the FDA discovered the presence of squalene in certain lots of AVIP product. A test was developed to detect anti-squalene antibodies in GWS patients, and a clear link was established between the contaminated product and all the GWS sufferers who had been injected with the vaccine containing squalene.

A study conducted at Tulane Medical School and published in the February 2000 issue of Experimental Molecular Pathology included these stunning statistics:

“ … the substantial majority (95%) of overtly ill deployed GWS patients had antibodies to squalene. All (100%) GWS patients immunized for service in Desert Shield/Desert Storm who did not deploy, but had the same signs and symptoms as those who did deploy, had antibodies to squalene.

In contrast, none (0%) of the deployed Persian Gulf veterans not showing signs and symptoms of GWS have antibodies to squalene. Neither patients with idiopathic autoimmune disease nor healthy controls had detectable serum antibodies to squalene. The majority of symptomatic GWS patients had serum antibodies to squalene.”[xi]

According to Dr. Viera Scheibner, Ph.D., a former principle research scientist for the government of Australia:

“… this adjuvant [squalene] contributed to the cascade of reactions called "Gulf War Syndrome," documented in the soldiers involved in the Gulf War.

The symptoms they developed included arthritis, fibromyalgia, lymphadenopathy, rashes, photosensitive rashes, malar rashes, chronic fatigue, chronic headaches, abnormal body hair loss, non-healing skin lesions, aphthous ulcers, dizziness, weakness, memory loss, seizures, mood changes, neuropsychiatric problems, anti-thyroid effects, anaemia, elevated ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate), systemic lupus erythematosus, multiple sclerosis, ALS (amyotrophic lateral sclerosis), Raynaud’s phenomenon, Sjorgren’s syndrome, chronic diarrhoea, night sweats and low-grade fevers.”[xii]

Post Vaccination Follow-Up Might as Well Be Non-Existent

There is virtually no science to support the safety of vaccine injections on your long-term health or the health of your children. Follow-up studies last on average about two weeks, and look only for glaring injuries and illnesses.

Autoimmune disorders like those seen in Gulf War Syndrome frequently take years to diagnose due to the vagueness of early symptoms. Complaints like headaches, fatigue and chronic aches and pains are symptoms of many different illnesses and diseases.

Don’t hold your breath waiting for vaccine purveyors and proponents to look seriously at the long-term health consequences of their vaccination campaigns.

What You Can Do Right Now